Alpha Trading Monacco Sam v. Ship "Sarah Desgagnes"

Alpha Trading Monacco Sam v. Ship "Sarah Desgagnes"
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2011-02-01
Neutral citation
2011 FCA 41
File numbers
A-253-10
Decision Content
Date: 20110201
Docket: A-253-10
Citation: 2011 FCA 41
CORAM: NADON J.A.
SHARLOW J.A.
LAYDEN-STEVENSON J.A.
BETWEEN:
ALPHA TRADING MONACCO SAM
Appellant
and
THE SHIP “SARAH DESGAGNES”
THE OWNERS AND ALL OTHERS INTERESTED IN THE SHIP
“SARAH DESGAGNES”
TRANSPORT DESGAGNES INC.
PETRO-NAV INC.
Respondents
Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on February 1, 2011.
Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on February 1, 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NADON J.A.
Date: 20110201
Docket: A-253-10
Citation: 2011 FCA 41
CORAM: NADON J.A.
SHARLOW J.A.
LAYDEN-STEVENSON J.A.
BETWEEN:
ALPHA TRADING MONACCO SAM
Appellant
and
THE SHIP “SARAH DESGAGNES”
THE OWNERS AND ALL OTHERS INTERESTED IN THE SHIP
“SARAH DESGAGNES”
TRANSPORT DESGAGNES INC.
PETRO-NAV INC.
Respondents
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on February 1, 2011)
NADON J.A.
[1] Given that by reason of the arrest of their ship the “SARAH DESGAGNES” (the “ship”) in Montreal on December 11, 2009 by the appellant, the respondents undertook to submit themselves and their ship to the jurisdiction of the Federal Court and to provide security for the appellant’s claims, and given that the re-arrest of their ship by the appellant in Belgium on May 4, 2010, in the particular circumstances of the case, clearly constitutes an attempt on the part of the appellant to take unfair advantage of the respondents by forcing them to provide security to guarantee a judgment against a third party, we are of the view that we ought not to interfere with Harrington J.’s decision of June 24, 2010.
[2] Consequently, the appeal will be dismissed with costs.
“M. Nadon”
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-253-10
STYLE OF CAUSE: ALPHA TRADING MONACCO SAM v. THE SHIP “SARAH DESGAGNES” et al
PLACE OF HEARING: Ottawa, Ontario
DATE OF HEARING: February 1, 2011
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NADON, SHARLOW, LAYDEN-STEVENSON JJ.A.
DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: NADON J.A.
APPEARANCES:
Flora Wahnon
Isabelle Pillet
FOR THE APPELLANT
Louis Buteau
Marie-Claude Laplante
FOR THE RESPONDENT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
De Man, Pilotte
Montreal, QC
FOR THE APPELLANT
Robinson Sheppard Shapiro LLP
Montreal, QC
FOR THE RESPONDENT