Fee et al. v. Bradshaw et al.
Court headnote
Fee et al. v. Bradshaw et al. Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1981-06-06 Report [1982] 1 SCR 608 Case number 15179 Judges Martland, Ronald; Ritchie, Roland Almon; Dickson, Robert George Brian; Beetz, Jean; Lamer, Antonio On appeal from Canada Subjects Appeal Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Fee et al. v. Bradshaw et al., [1982] 1 S.C.R. 608 Date: 1981-06-06 Harvey Fee and Affiliated Offices Ltd. Appellants; and M.J. Bradshaw, H.O. Merret, R.W. Arbuckle, H.E. Garland, S.F. Hobart, J.S. Hodgson and Bud Cullen Respondents. File No.: 15179. 1981: June 6. Present: Martland, Ritchie, Dickson, Beetz and Lamer JJ. MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR HEARING AND TO REINSCRIBE Appeal—Practice—Leave to appeal granted—Appeal held to be abandoned—Re-hearing granted—Motions for extension of time for hearing of appeal and to reinscribe appeal for hearing. On February 9, 1981 the Court held the appeal at bar to have been abandoned, [1982] 1 S.C.R. 607. On April 6, 1981 a re-hearing was granted, [1981] 1 S.C.R. viii, on the question of whether this appeal should be held to have been abandoned pursuant to Rule 59 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada. MOTIONS for extension of time for hearing and to reinscribe the appeal for hearing. Motions granted[1]. Philippe Cas grain, Q.C., for the appellants. James Mabbutt, for the respondents. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by MARTLAND J.—In view of consent of counsel for respondents, the applications for a rehearing …
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.scc-csc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Fee et al. v. Bradshaw et al. Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1981-06-06 Report [1982] 1 SCR 608 Case number 15179 Judges Martland, Ronald; Ritchie, Roland Almon; Dickson, Robert George Brian; Beetz, Jean; Lamer, Antonio On appeal from Canada Subjects Appeal Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Fee et al. v. Bradshaw et al., [1982] 1 S.C.R. 608 Date: 1981-06-06 Harvey Fee and Affiliated Offices Ltd. Appellants; and M.J. Bradshaw, H.O. Merret, R.W. Arbuckle, H.E. Garland, S.F. Hobart, J.S. Hodgson and Bud Cullen Respondents. File No.: 15179. 1981: June 6. Present: Martland, Ritchie, Dickson, Beetz and Lamer JJ. MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR HEARING AND TO REINSCRIBE Appeal—Practice—Leave to appeal granted—Appeal held to be abandoned—Re-hearing granted—Motions for extension of time for hearing of appeal and to reinscribe appeal for hearing. On February 9, 1981 the Court held the appeal at bar to have been abandoned, [1982] 1 S.C.R. 607. On April 6, 1981 a re-hearing was granted, [1981] 1 S.C.R. viii, on the question of whether this appeal should be held to have been abandoned pursuant to Rule 59 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada. MOTIONS for extension of time for hearing and to reinscribe the appeal for hearing. Motions granted[1]. Philippe Cas grain, Q.C., for the appellants. James Mabbutt, for the respondents. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by MARTLAND J.—In view of consent of counsel for respondents, the applications for a rehearing and extension of time are granted. The appeal will be reinscribed. There will be no costs. Motions granted. Solicitors for the appellants: Byers, Casgrain, McNally, Dingle, Benn & Lefebvre, Montreal. Solicitors for the respondents: Gaspard Côté and Jacques Ouellet, Montreal. [1] See [1982] 1 S.C.R. 609.
Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca
Administration des aéroports régionaux d’Edmonton c. Thibodeau
2024 CAF 196