Bomongo v. Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada
Source text
Bomongo v. Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2010-03-19 Neutral citation 2010 FCA 77 File numbers A-334-09 Decision Content Federal Court of Appeal Cour d'appel fédérale Date: 20100319 Docket: A‑334‑09 Citation: 2010 FCA 77 Present: NOËL J.A. BETWEEN: CHRISTIAN BOMONGO, PATRICK KENABANTU, TARIK LAASSEL Applicants and COMMUNICATIONS, ENERGY AND PAPERWORKERS UNION OF CANADA and BELL CANADA Respondents Dealt with in writing without appearance of parties. Order delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on March 19, 2010. REASONS FOR ORDER BY: NOËL J.A. Federal Court of Appeal Cour d'appel fédérale Date: 20100319 Docket: A‑334‑09 Citation: 2010 FCA 77 Present: NOËL J.A. BETWEEN: CHRISTIAN BOMONGO, PATRICK KENABANTU, TARIK LAASSEL Applicants and COMMUNICATIONS, ENERGY AND PAPERWORKERS UNION OF CANADA and BELL CANADA Respondents REASONS FOR ORDER [1] The applicants are requesting leave to file three additional affidavits under section 312 of the Federal Courts Rules. [2] The request is out of time, since proceedings have reached the request for hearing stage, and the motion provides no explanation whatsoever of why the affidavits were not filed within the time prescribed by Rule 306 of the Federal Courts Rules. [3] Furthermore, the affidavits do not comply with Rule 81 of the Federal Courts Rules in that they essentially take the form of an argument, and none of the attached exhibits are part of the record as consti…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Bomongo v. Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2010-03-19 Neutral citation 2010 FCA 77 File numbers A-334-09 Decision Content Federal Court of Appeal Cour d'appel fédérale Date: 20100319 Docket: A‑334‑09 Citation: 2010 FCA 77 Present: NOËL J.A. BETWEEN: CHRISTIAN BOMONGO, PATRICK KENABANTU, TARIK LAASSEL Applicants and COMMUNICATIONS, ENERGY AND PAPERWORKERS UNION OF CANADA and BELL CANADA Respondents Dealt with in writing without appearance of parties. Order delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on March 19, 2010. REASONS FOR ORDER BY: NOËL J.A. Federal Court of Appeal Cour d'appel fédérale Date: 20100319 Docket: A‑334‑09 Citation: 2010 FCA 77 Present: NOËL J.A. BETWEEN: CHRISTIAN BOMONGO, PATRICK KENABANTU, TARIK LAASSEL Applicants and COMMUNICATIONS, ENERGY AND PAPERWORKERS UNION OF CANADA and BELL CANADA Respondents REASONS FOR ORDER [1] The applicants are requesting leave to file three additional affidavits under section 312 of the Federal Courts Rules. [2] The request is out of time, since proceedings have reached the request for hearing stage, and the motion provides no explanation whatsoever of why the affidavits were not filed within the time prescribed by Rule 306 of the Federal Courts Rules. [3] Furthermore, the affidavits do not comply with Rule 81 of the Federal Courts Rules in that they essentially take the form of an argument, and none of the attached exhibits are part of the record as constituted before the Canada Industrial Relations Board. [4] In the circumstances, leave to file should not be granted. [5] The motion is dismissed with costs. “Marc Noël” J.A. Certified true translation Sarah Burns FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A‑334‑09 STYLE OF CAUSE: CHRISTIAN BOMONGO, PATRICK KENABANTU, TARIK LAASSEL and COMMUNICATIONS, ENERGY AND PAPERWORKERS UNION OF CANADA AND BELL CANADA MOTION DEALT WITH IN WRITING WITHOUT APPEARANCE OF PARTIES REASONS FOR ORDER BY: NOËL J.A. DATED: March 19, 2010 WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS BY: Christian Bomongo Patrick Kenabantu Tarik Laassel SELF‑REPRESENTED SELF‑REPRESENTED SELF‑REPRESENTED Claude Tardif FOR THE RESPONDENT (Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada) Mireille Begeron FOR THE RESPONDENT (Bell Canada) SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Christian Bomongo Patrick Kenabantu Tarik Laassel SELF-REPRESENTED SELF-REPRESENTED SELF-REPRESENTED Rivest Schmidt Montréal, Quebec FOR THE RESPONDENT (Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada) Mireille Bergeron Bell Canada, Legal Services Verdun, Quebec FOR THE RESPONDENT (Bell Canada)
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca
Quebec (Attorney General) v A
[2013] 1 SCR 61