Skip to main content
Federal Court of Appeal· 2006

Baird v. Canada

2006 FCA 182
GeneralJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Baird v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2006-05-18 Neutral citation 2006 FCA 182 File numbers A-78-06 Decision Content Date: 20060518 Docket: A-78-06 Citation: 2006 FCA 182 Present: PELLETIER J.A. BETWEEN: JAMES RUSSELL BAIRD Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent Dealt with in writing without appearance of parties. Order delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on May 18, 2006. REASONS FOR ORDER BY: PELLETIER J.A. Date: 20060518 Docket: A-78-06 Citation: 2006 FCA 182 Present: PELLETIER J.A. BETWEEN: JAMES RUSSELL BAIRD Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER PELLETIER J.A. [1] The respondent Her Majesty the Queen seeks an order for security for costs in the appeal from the dismissal of the appellant John Baird's Statement of Claim, as well as with respect to the appellant's motion for an extension of time to file Notices of appeal with respect to the dismissal of two interlocutory motions. [2] It is clear from the respondent's material that the appellant has no sense of relevance or proportion in the preparation of the material which he files in support of his various proceedings. In that regard, he resembles countless other self-represented litigants. His conduct is not so egregious that this Court should gag him by an order for security for costs. [3] Mr. Baird will have to comply with the Federal Courts Rules with respect to the length of his memorandum in the appeal. [4] The motion for security for costs, and the in…

Read full judgment
Baird v. Canada
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2006-05-18
Neutral citation
2006 FCA 182
File numbers
A-78-06
Decision Content
Date: 20060518
Docket: A-78-06
Citation: 2006 FCA 182
Present: PELLETIER J.A.
BETWEEN:
JAMES RUSSELL BAIRD
Appellant
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Respondent
Dealt with in writing without appearance of parties.
Order delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on May 18, 2006.
REASONS FOR ORDER BY: PELLETIER J.A.
Date: 20060518
Docket: A-78-06
Citation: 2006 FCA 182
Present: PELLETIER J.A.
BETWEEN:
JAMES RUSSELL BAIRD
Appellant
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Respondent
REASONS FOR ORDER
PELLETIER J.A.
[1] The respondent Her Majesty the Queen seeks an order for security for costs in the appeal from the dismissal of the appellant John Baird's Statement of Claim, as well as with respect to the appellant's motion for an extension of time to file Notices of appeal with respect to the dismissal of two interlocutory motions.
[2] It is clear from the respondent's material that the appellant has no sense of relevance or proportion in the preparation of the material which he files in support of his various proceedings. In that regard, he resembles countless other self-represented litigants. His conduct is not so egregious that this Court should gag him by an order for security for costs.
[3] Mr. Baird will have to comply with the Federal Courts Rules with respect to the length of his memorandum in the appeal.
[4] The motion for security for costs, and the incidental relief sought, will be dismissed.
[5] In a separate order, I have dismissed Mr. Baird's motion for an extension of time to file notices of appeal from the dismissal of his interlocutory appeals. Consequently, the respondent does not need an extension of time to respond to that motion.
"J.D. Denis Pelletier"
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-78-06
STYLE OF CAUSE: James Russell Baird and Her Majesty the Queen
MOTION DEALT WITH IN WRITING WITHOUT APPEARANCE OF PARTIES
REASONS FOR ORDER BY: PELLETIER J.A.
DATED: May 18, 2006
WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS BY:
Mr. James Russell Baird
ON HIS OWN BEHALF
Mrs. Vladena Hola
FOR THE RESPONDENT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
John H. Sims, Q.C.
Ottawa, Ontario
FOR THE RESPONDENT

Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca

Related cases