Burlacu v. Canada (Attorney General)
Source text
Burlacu v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2021-03-02 Neutral citation 2021 FCA 44 File numbers A-114-19 Notes A correction was made on March 5, 2021 Decision Content Date: 20210302 Docket: A-114-19 Citation: 2021 FCA 44 CORAM: NADON J.A. NEAR J.A. MACTAVISH J.A. BETWEEN: ALEXANDRU-IOAN BURLACU Appellant and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Heard by online video conference hosted by the Registry on March 2, 2021. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on March 2, 2021. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NEAR J.A. Date: 20210302 Docket: A-114-19 Citation: 2021 FCA 44 CORAM: NADON J.A. NEAR J.A. MACTAVISH J.A. BETWEEN: ALEXANDRU-IOAN BURLACU Appellant and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on March 2, 2021). NEAR J.A. [1] We are all agreed that the appeal should be allowed, that the decision of the Federal Court dated February 28, 2019, in file T-1139-18, should be set aside and that the appellant’s motion, filed with the consent of the respondent on January 28, 2018 should be allowed only to the extent that the appellant, within 20 days of the date of this judgment, shall serve and file the Application Record in electronic format, including the Certified Tribunal Record, in accordance with the provisions of the Practice Direction of the Federal Court regarding COVID-19, Update #7, issued by the Federal Court on Ja…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Burlacu v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2021-03-02 Neutral citation 2021 FCA 44 File numbers A-114-19 Notes A correction was made on March 5, 2021 Decision Content Date: 20210302 Docket: A-114-19 Citation: 2021 FCA 44 CORAM: NADON J.A. NEAR J.A. MACTAVISH J.A. BETWEEN: ALEXANDRU-IOAN BURLACU Appellant and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Heard by online video conference hosted by the Registry on March 2, 2021. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on March 2, 2021. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NEAR J.A. Date: 20210302 Docket: A-114-19 Citation: 2021 FCA 44 CORAM: NADON J.A. NEAR J.A. MACTAVISH J.A. BETWEEN: ALEXANDRU-IOAN BURLACU Appellant and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on March 2, 2021). NEAR J.A. [1] We are all agreed that the appeal should be allowed, that the decision of the Federal Court dated February 28, 2019, in file T-1139-18, should be set aside and that the appellant’s motion, filed with the consent of the respondent on January 28, 2018 should be allowed only to the extent that the appellant, within 20 days of the date of this judgment, shall serve and file the Application Record in electronic format, including the Certified Tribunal Record, in accordance with the provisions of the Practice Direction of the Federal Court regarding COVID-19, Update #7, issued by the Federal Court on January 18, 2021. [2] The appellant should have his costs of the appeal fixed in the sum of $300, all inclusive. “D.G. Near” J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD Docket: A-114-19 STYLE OF CAUSE: ALEXANDRU-IOAN BURLACU v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA PLACE OF HEARING: BY ONLINE VIDEO CONFERENCE DATE OF HEARING: March 2, 2021 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NEAR J.A. DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: NEAR J.A. APPEARANCES: Alexandru-Ioan Burlacu sELF-REPRESENTED Nour Rashid For The Respondent SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Nathalie G. Drouin Deputy Attorney General of Canada For The Respondent
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca
Administration des aéroports régionaux d’Edmonton c. Thibodeau
2024 CAF 196