Zrig v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
Court headnote
Zrig v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2005-06-03 Neutral citation 2005 FCA 212 File numbers A-33-02 Decision Content Date: 20050603 Docket: A-33-02 Citation: 2005 FCA 212 BETWEEN: MOHAMED ZRIG Appellant AND MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS [1] At the request of the respondent, the assessment of his bill of costs proceeded without personal appearance of the parties. To date, we have not received any reply to our letter dated April 12, 2005, directing the appellant to submit his written submissions by May 6, 2005. [2] After reviewing the proceedings in the file and the evidence submitted, the respondent's fees are assessed in the amount of $2,970 for the following items of Tariff B: items 19 (7 units), 22 (3 units X 6 hours) and 26 (2 units). The claims made under item 21 are refused because the orders made on motions heard in accordance with rule 369 of the Federal Court Rules are silent on the issue of costs. We have reduced the number of units for the assessment of costs given that none of it was disputed. With respect to the disbursements incurred in this appeal, they are awarded as claimed in the amount of $2,137.81. [3] Accordingly, the respondent's costs are assessed and allowed in the amount of $5,107.81. A certificate is issued for that amount. DATED AT MONTRÉAL, THE 3rd DAY OF JUNE 2005 Signed: "Michelle Lamy" MICHELLE LAMY ASSESSMENT OFFICER Ce…
Read full judgment
Zrig v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2005-06-03 Neutral citation 2005 FCA 212 File numbers A-33-02 Decision Content Date: 20050603 Docket: A-33-02 Citation: 2005 FCA 212 BETWEEN: MOHAMED ZRIG Appellant AND MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS [1] At the request of the respondent, the assessment of his bill of costs proceeded without personal appearance of the parties. To date, we have not received any reply to our letter dated April 12, 2005, directing the appellant to submit his written submissions by May 6, 2005. [2] After reviewing the proceedings in the file and the evidence submitted, the respondent's fees are assessed in the amount of $2,970 for the following items of Tariff B: items 19 (7 units), 22 (3 units X 6 hours) and 26 (2 units). The claims made under item 21 are refused because the orders made on motions heard in accordance with rule 369 of the Federal Court Rules are silent on the issue of costs. We have reduced the number of units for the assessment of costs given that none of it was disputed. With respect to the disbursements incurred in this appeal, they are awarded as claimed in the amount of $2,137.81. [3] Accordingly, the respondent's costs are assessed and allowed in the amount of $5,107.81. A certificate is issued for that amount. DATED AT MONTRÉAL, THE 3rd DAY OF JUNE 2005 Signed: "Michelle Lamy" MICHELLE LAMY ASSESSMENT OFFICER Certified true translation Kelley A. Harvey, BCL, LLB FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET NO.: A-33-02 MOHAMED ZRIG Appellant AND MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS IN WRITING PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Montréal, Quebec REASONS OF MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER DATE OF REASONS: JUNE 3, 2005 SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Alarie, Legault, Beauchemin, Paquin, Jobin, Brisson & Philpot Montréal, Quebec For the appellant John Sims Deputy Attorney General of Canada Ottawa, Ontario For the respondent
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca