Evdokias v. Poulin
Source text
Evdokias v. Poulin Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2005-03-16 Neutral citation 2005 FCA 98 File numbers A-170-01 Decision Content Date: 20050316 Docket: A-170-01 Citation: 2005 FCA 98 CORAM: DÉCARY J.A. LÉTOURNEAU J.A. NADON J.A. BETWEEN: PETER EVDOKIAS, HINLA CORPORATION, CCMG - CANADIAN CONSULTANT & MANAGEMENT GROUP LTD. ATHENA LEVANTIS Appellants and ADESSKI POULIN Respondent and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Co-respondent Heard at Montréal, Quebec, on March 14, 2005. Judgment delivered at Montréal, Quebec, on March 16, 2005. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: DÉCARY J.A. CONCURRED IN BY: LÉTOURNEAU J.A. NADON J.A. Date: 20050316 Docket: A-170-01 Citation: 2005 FCA 98 CORAM: DÉCARY J.A. LÉTOURNEAU J.A. NADON J.A. BETWEEN: PETER EVDOKIAS, HINLA CORPORATION, CCMG - CANADIAN CONSULTANT & MANAGEMENT GROUP LTD. ATHENA LEVANTIS Appellants and ADESSKI POULIN Respondent and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Co-respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT DÉCARY J.A. [1] This is an appeal from an Order of Madam Justice Tremblay-Lamer allowing the respondent law firm to be removed as solicitors of record for the appellants. The Order was made by default. [2] Despite the lengthy written submissions of the appellants, who essentially argue that the Default Order was obtained fraudulently and that there had never been any disagreement between themselves and the respondent regarding the fees arrangement, we have found no reviewable error in the impugned order. [3] The appeal should be dismissed with cos…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Evdokias v. Poulin Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2005-03-16 Neutral citation 2005 FCA 98 File numbers A-170-01 Decision Content Date: 20050316 Docket: A-170-01 Citation: 2005 FCA 98 CORAM: DÉCARY J.A. LÉTOURNEAU J.A. NADON J.A. BETWEEN: PETER EVDOKIAS, HINLA CORPORATION, CCMG - CANADIAN CONSULTANT & MANAGEMENT GROUP LTD. ATHENA LEVANTIS Appellants and ADESSKI POULIN Respondent and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Co-respondent Heard at Montréal, Quebec, on March 14, 2005. Judgment delivered at Montréal, Quebec, on March 16, 2005. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: DÉCARY J.A. CONCURRED IN BY: LÉTOURNEAU J.A. NADON J.A. Date: 20050316 Docket: A-170-01 Citation: 2005 FCA 98 CORAM: DÉCARY J.A. LÉTOURNEAU J.A. NADON J.A. BETWEEN: PETER EVDOKIAS, HINLA CORPORATION, CCMG - CANADIAN CONSULTANT & MANAGEMENT GROUP LTD. ATHENA LEVANTIS Appellants and ADESSKI POULIN Respondent and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Co-respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT DÉCARY J.A. [1] This is an appeal from an Order of Madam Justice Tremblay-Lamer allowing the respondent law firm to be removed as solicitors of record for the appellants. The Order was made by default. [2] Despite the lengthy written submissions of the appellants, who essentially argue that the Default Order was obtained fraudulently and that there had never been any disagreement between themselves and the respondent regarding the fees arrangement, we have found no reviewable error in the impugned order. [3] The appeal should be dismissed with costs in favour of the respondent Adesski Poulin. "Robert Décary" J.A. "I agree Gilles Létourneau J.A." "I agree Marc Nadon J.A." FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-170-01 STYLE OF CAUSE: PETER EVDOKIAS, HINLA CORPORATION, CCMG - CANADIAN CONSULTANT & MANAGEMENT GROUP LTD. ATHENA LEVANTIS Appellants and ADESSKI POULIN Respondent and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Co-respondent PLACE OF HEARING: Montréal DATE OF HEARING: March 14, 2005 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT: DÉCARY J.A. CONCURRED IN BY: LÉTOURNEAU J.A. NADON J.A. DATED: March 16, 2005 APPEARANCES: Mr. Peter Evdokias FOR THE APPELLANTS Mr. Gilles Poulin Ms. Michelle Lavergne FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Mr. Peter Evdokias Bouchervile, Quebec FOR THE APPELLANTS Adessky Poulin Montréal, Quebec FOR THE RESPONDENT
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca
Quebec (Attorney General) v A
[2013] 1 SCR 61