91633 Canada Ltée v. Canada
Source text
91633 Canada Ltée v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2006-10-06 Neutral citation 2006 FCA 322 File numbers A-4-05, A-5-05 Decision Content Date: 20061006 Dockets: A-4-05 A-5-05 Citation: 2006 FCA 322 BETWEEN: 91633 CANADA LTÉE Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS – REASONS MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] This is as assessment of the respondent's bill of costs following a judgment rendered on March 16, 2006, dismissing the appeals from a decision by the Tax Court of Canada. [2] On August 8, 2006, I gave the parties a schedule for serving and filing their written submissions. As no submissions have been filed to date, I shall now proceed with the assessment of costs in accordance with the documents of record. [3] Fees are set in the amount of $1,420.08 for services rendered under sections 19 (5 units), 20 (1 unit), 22 (2 units x 1.417), 25 (1 unit) and 26 (2 units) of Tariff B. I have reduced to 2 the number of units for assessment of costs since this was a simple and uncontested case. The costs in the amount of $98.75 incurred in this case, and which have been proven by affidavit, are allowed as claimed. [4] In the light of the above, the respondent's fees are set in the amount of $1,518.83, a certificate is issued for this amount in the docket A-4-05, and a copy of the reasons therefor is inserted into docket A‑5‑05. DATED AT MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC, THIS 6th DAY OF OCTOBER 2006 SIGNED: "Michelle Lamy" MICHELLE LAM…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
91633 Canada Ltée v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2006-10-06 Neutral citation 2006 FCA 322 File numbers A-4-05, A-5-05 Decision Content Date: 20061006 Dockets: A-4-05 A-5-05 Citation: 2006 FCA 322 BETWEEN: 91633 CANADA LTÉE Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS – REASONS MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] This is as assessment of the respondent's bill of costs following a judgment rendered on March 16, 2006, dismissing the appeals from a decision by the Tax Court of Canada. [2] On August 8, 2006, I gave the parties a schedule for serving and filing their written submissions. As no submissions have been filed to date, I shall now proceed with the assessment of costs in accordance with the documents of record. [3] Fees are set in the amount of $1,420.08 for services rendered under sections 19 (5 units), 20 (1 unit), 22 (2 units x 1.417), 25 (1 unit) and 26 (2 units) of Tariff B. I have reduced to 2 the number of units for assessment of costs since this was a simple and uncontested case. The costs in the amount of $98.75 incurred in this case, and which have been proven by affidavit, are allowed as claimed. [4] In the light of the above, the respondent's fees are set in the amount of $1,518.83, a certificate is issued for this amount in the docket A-4-05, and a copy of the reasons therefor is inserted into docket A‑5‑05. DATED AT MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC, THIS 6th DAY OF OCTOBER 2006 SIGNED: "Michelle Lamy" MICHELLE LAMY ASSESSMENT OFFICER Certified true translation Elizabeth Tan, Translator FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-4-05 A-5-05 BETWEEN: 91633 CANADA LTÉE Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent WRITTEN ASSESSMENT OF COSTS PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Montréal (Québec) REASONS BY MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER DATED: October 6, 2006 SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Serge Fournier Montréal, Quebec FOR THE APPELLANT John H. Sims, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada FOR THE RESPONDENT Date: 20061006 Dockets: A-4-05 A-5-05 Between: 91633 CANADA LTÉE Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent CERTIFICAT OF ASSESSMENT OF COSTS I hereby certify that the defendant's costs in this case have been assessed and allowed in the amount of $1,518.83. SIGNED: "Michelle Lamy" MICHELLE LAMY ASSESSMENT OFFICER MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC October 6, 2006 Certified true translation Elizabeth Tan, Translator
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca
Quebec (Attorney General) v A
[2013] 1 SCR 61