Skip to main content
Federal Court of Appeal· 2005

WIC TV Amalco Inc. v. ITV Technologies Inc.

2005 FCA 253
GeneralJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

WIC TV Amalco Inc. v. ITV Technologies Inc. Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2005-07-07 Neutral citation 2005 FCA 253 File numbers A-469-03 Decision Content Date: 20050707 Docket: A-469-03 Citation: 2005 FCA 253 CORAM: NOËL J.A. EVANS J.A. PELLETIER J.A. BETWEEN: WIC TV AMALCO INC. and GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED Appellants and ITV TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Respondent Dealt with in writing without appearance of parties. Order delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on July 7, 2005. REASONS FOR ORDER BY: NOËL J.A. CONCURRED IN BY: EVANS J.A. PELLETIER J.A. Date: 20050707 Docket: A-469-03 Citation: 2005 FCA 253 CORAM: NOËL J.A. EVANS J.A. PELLETIER J.A. BETWEEN: WIC TV AMALCO INC. and GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED Appellants and ITV TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER NOËL J.A. [1] The respondent seeks an increase cost award relying on the existence of an offer to settle and the complexity of the appeal. [2] As the offer to settle was made before trial, it does not affect appellate costs unless renewed before appeal (Century Services Inc. v. ZI Corp. (1998), 228 A.R. 103, 1998 ABCA 403; Niagara Steel (St. Catharines) Ltd. v. W.D. Laflamme Ltd. (1987), 58 O.R. (ed) 773, (1987), 19 C.P.C. (2d) 163; Douglas Hamilton Design Inc. v. Mark (1993), 20 C.P.C. (3d) 224, [1993] O.J. No. 1856 (O)nt. C.A.)). [3] Otherwise the Court has not been convinced that the nature of the appeal or its complexity warrant the issuance of a special direction to the assessment office…

Read full judgment
WIC TV Amalco Inc. v. ITV Technologies Inc.
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2005-07-07
Neutral citation
2005 FCA 253
File numbers
A-469-03
Decision Content
Date: 20050707
Docket: A-469-03
Citation: 2005 FCA 253
CORAM: NOËL J.A.
EVANS J.A.
PELLETIER J.A.
BETWEEN:
WIC TV AMALCO INC. and
GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED
Appellants
and
ITV TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Respondent
Dealt with in writing without appearance of parties.
Order delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on July 7, 2005.
REASONS FOR ORDER BY: NOËL J.A.
CONCURRED IN BY: EVANS J.A.
PELLETIER J.A.
Date: 20050707
Docket: A-469-03
Citation: 2005 FCA 253
CORAM: NOËL J.A.
EVANS J.A.
PELLETIER J.A.
BETWEEN:
WIC TV AMALCO INC. and
GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED
Appellants
and
ITV TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Respondent
REASONS FOR ORDER
NOËL J.A.
[1] The respondent seeks an increase cost award relying on the existence of an offer to settle and the complexity of the appeal.
[2] As the offer to settle was made before trial, it does not affect appellate costs unless renewed before appeal (Century Services Inc. v. ZI Corp. (1998), 228 A.R. 103, 1998 ABCA 403; Niagara Steel (St. Catharines) Ltd. v. W.D. Laflamme Ltd. (1987), 58 O.R. (ed) 773, (1987), 19 C.P.C. (2d) 163; Douglas Hamilton Design Inc. v. Mark (1993), 20 C.P.C. (3d) 224, [1993] O.J. No. 1856 (O)nt. C.A.)).
[3] Otherwise the Court has not been convinced that the nature of the appeal or its complexity warrant the issuance of a special direction to the assessment officer.
[4] The motion will be dismissed with costs.
"Marc Noël"
J.A.
"J.M.E."
"DP"
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-469-03
STYLE OF CAUSE: WIC TV AMALCO INC. and GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED and ITV TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
MOTION DEALT WITH IN WRITING WITHOUT APPEARANCE OF PARTIES
REASONS FOR ORDER BY: Noël J.A.
CONQUERED IN BY: Evans J.A.
Pelletier J.A.
DATED: July 7, 2005
WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS BY:
Mr. Brian D. Edmonds
FOR THE APPELLANT
Mr. Paul Gornall
FOR THE RESPONDENT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
McCarthy Tétrault LLP
Barristers and Solicitors
Toronto, Ontario
FOR THE APPELLANT
Barrister and Solicitor
Vancouver, British Columbia
FOR THE RESPONDENT

Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca

Related cases