Novopharm Limited v. Canada (Health)
Source text
Novopharm Limited v. Canada (Health) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2007-09-04 Neutral citation 2007 FCA 275 File numbers A-189-07 Decision Content Date: 20070904 Docket: A-189-07 Citation: 2007 FCA 275 CORAM: RICHARD C.J. SEXTON J.A. SHARLOW J.A. BETWEEN: NOVOPHARM LIMITED Appellant and THE MINISTER OF HEALTH, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA and SANOFI-AVENTIS CANADA INC. Respondents Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on September 4, 2007. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on September 4, 2007. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: RICHARD C.J. Date: 20070904 Docket: A-189-07 Citation: 2007 FCA 275 CORAM: RICHARD C.J. SEXTON J.A. SHARLOW J.A. BETWEEN: NOVOPHARM LIMITED Appellant and THE MINISTER OF HEALTH, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA and SANOFI-AVENTIS CANADA INC. Respondents REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on September 4, 2007) RICHARD C.J. [1] We have determined that the appeal is moot and have decided not to exercise our discretion to hear the appeal. [2] The motion to dismiss the appeal for mootness will be allowed and the appeal will be dismissed with costs. "J. Richard" Chief Justice FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-189-07 APPEAL FROM A DECISION OF JUSTICE HUGHES DATED MARCH 20, 2007 STYLE OF CAUSE: Novopharm Limited v. Minister of Health, Attorney General Of Canada and Sanofi-Aventis Canada Inc. PLACE OF HEARING: Ottawa DATE OF HEARING: September …
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Novopharm Limited v. Canada (Health) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2007-09-04 Neutral citation 2007 FCA 275 File numbers A-189-07 Decision Content Date: 20070904 Docket: A-189-07 Citation: 2007 FCA 275 CORAM: RICHARD C.J. SEXTON J.A. SHARLOW J.A. BETWEEN: NOVOPHARM LIMITED Appellant and THE MINISTER OF HEALTH, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA and SANOFI-AVENTIS CANADA INC. Respondents Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on September 4, 2007. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on September 4, 2007. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: RICHARD C.J. Date: 20070904 Docket: A-189-07 Citation: 2007 FCA 275 CORAM: RICHARD C.J. SEXTON J.A. SHARLOW J.A. BETWEEN: NOVOPHARM LIMITED Appellant and THE MINISTER OF HEALTH, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA and SANOFI-AVENTIS CANADA INC. Respondents REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on September 4, 2007) RICHARD C.J. [1] We have determined that the appeal is moot and have decided not to exercise our discretion to hear the appeal. [2] The motion to dismiss the appeal for mootness will be allowed and the appeal will be dismissed with costs. "J. Richard" Chief Justice FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-189-07 APPEAL FROM A DECISION OF JUSTICE HUGHES DATED MARCH 20, 2007 STYLE OF CAUSE: Novopharm Limited v. Minister of Health, Attorney General Of Canada and Sanofi-Aventis Canada Inc. PLACE OF HEARING: Ottawa DATE OF HEARING: September 4, 2007 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: Richard C.J. DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: Richard C.J. APPEARANCES: Mr. Jeffrey Leon FOR THE APPELLANT Mr. Robert Staley Ms. Dominique Hussey Mr. Rick Woyiwada FOR THE MINISTER OF HEALTH Mr. David Cowie AND AGC Mr. Gunars Gaikis FOR SANOFI-AVENTIS CANADA Mr. Robert Staley Ms. Dominique Hussey SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Bennett Jones LLP, Toronto, Ontario FOR THE APPELLANT John Sims, Deputy Attorney General of Canada, FOR THE MINISTER OF Ottawa, Ontario HEALTH AND AGC Smart & Biggar, Toronto, Ontario FOR SANOFI-AVENTIS CANADA Date: 20070904 Docket: A-189-07 Ottawa, Ontario, September 4, 2007 CORAM: RICHARD C.J. SEXTON J.A. SHARLOW J.A. BETWEEN: NOVOPHARM LIMITED Appellant and THE MINISTER OF HEALTH, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA and SANOFI-AVENTIS CANADA INC. Respondents JUDGMENT The motion to dismiss the appeal for mootness is allowed and the appeal is dismissed with costs. "J. Richard" Chief Justice
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca
Administration des aéroports régionaux d’Edmonton c. Thibodeau
2024 CAF 196