Roy v. Canada
Court headnote
Roy v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2001-11-06 Neutral citation 2001 FCA 334 File numbers A-660-97 Decision Content Date: 20011106 Docket: A-660-97 Neutral citation: 2001 FCA 334 Between: RICHARD ROY Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS RICHARD LARABIE, ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] On August 10, 2001 Martin Gentile filed a bill of costs on behalf of the respondent following the judgment rendered by the Court on November 3, 2000 dismissing with costs the appeal and the cross-appeal. [2] Mr. Gentile having requested that his bill be taxed in writing, letters were sent to the parties on August 7, 2001 inviting them to file and serne their representations. As no representations were received within the specified deadlines, the bill is assessed. [3] The claims for fees under each item were considered and, in the absence of opposition, are awarded except for: Item 17: Mr. Gentile claims fees under this item for preparing and filing notices of intention to participate in the appeal, whereas the services payable under this item are for the preparation, filing and service of the notice of appeal: this request is therefore denied; Item 26: As there was no opposition, the application under this item is reduced to $330. [4] The claim for disbursements in the amount of $5,300.99, supported by counsel's affidavit with supporting invoices, is allowed. [5] The respondent's costs are assessed and allowed in the amount of $1…
Read full judgment
Roy v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2001-11-06 Neutral citation 2001 FCA 334 File numbers A-660-97 Decision Content Date: 20011106 Docket: A-660-97 Neutral citation: 2001 FCA 334 Between: RICHARD ROY Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS RICHARD LARABIE, ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] On August 10, 2001 Martin Gentile filed a bill of costs on behalf of the respondent following the judgment rendered by the Court on November 3, 2000 dismissing with costs the appeal and the cross-appeal. [2] Mr. Gentile having requested that his bill be taxed in writing, letters were sent to the parties on August 7, 2001 inviting them to file and serne their representations. As no representations were received within the specified deadlines, the bill is assessed. [3] The claims for fees under each item were considered and, in the absence of opposition, are awarded except for: Item 17: Mr. Gentile claims fees under this item for preparing and filing notices of intention to participate in the appeal, whereas the services payable under this item are for the preparation, filing and service of the notice of appeal: this request is therefore denied; Item 26: As there was no opposition, the application under this item is reduced to $330. [4] The claim for disbursements in the amount of $5,300.99, supported by counsel's affidavit with supporting invoices, is allowed. [5] The respondent's costs are assessed and allowed in the amount of $1,430 for fees and $5,300.99 for disbursements. A certificate is issued in the amount of $6,730.99. [signed] RICHARD LARABIE ASSESSMENT OFFICER MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC November 6, 2001 Certified true translation Suzanne M. Gauthier, LL.L. Trad. a. FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA APPEAL DIVISION Date: 20011106 Docket: A-660-97 BETWEEN: RICHARD ROY Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA APPEAL DIVISION NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD COURT FILE No.: A-660-97 Between: RICHARD ROY Appellant AND HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Montréal, Quebec REASONS BY: RICHARD LARABIE, ASSESSMENT OFFICER DATE OF REASONS: November 6, 2001 SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Normand Roy for the appellant Québec, Quebec Morris Rosenberg for the respondent Deputy Attorney General of Canada Ottawa, Ontario
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca