Skip to main content
Federal Court· 2001

Tosic v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)

2001 FCT 1087
ImmigrationJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Tosic v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2001-10-03 Neutral citation 2001 FCT 1087 File numbers IMM-4164-01 Decision Content Date: 20011003 Docket: IMM-4164-01 Neutral citation: 2001 FCT 1087 BETWEEN: LJUBICA TOSIC Applicant - and - THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER LEMIEUX J.: [1] The applicant, a 69-year-old citizen of the Yugoslav Federation, seeks a stay of removal from Canada. [2] Her underlying leave application challenges an August 21, 2001 decision made by a Post Claim Determination Officer ("PCDO") that she was not a member of the PDRCC class. The applicant's written challenge and oral submissions by her daughter raise no serious issue that this decision was wrong. [3] The applicant apparently made an abortive attempt to file an H & C application in May of 2000 which was not processed because the Case Processing Centre in Vagreville, Alberta never received it nor were fees paid. [4] Last week, the applicant filed a fresh H & C application and, of course, no decision has yet been made. It is well-known that, in and of itself, an outstanding H & C application is not a ground for deferring a removal given the statutory duty in section 48 of the Immigration Act to execute removals as soon as practicable. [5] The applicant has not shown any grounds why her removal should not take place despite her difficult individual circumstances and those of her daughter and granddau…

Read full judgment
Tosic v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
Court (s) Database
Federal Court Decisions
Date
2001-10-03
Neutral citation
2001 FCT 1087
File numbers
IMM-4164-01
Decision Content
Date: 20011003
Docket: IMM-4164-01
Neutral citation: 2001 FCT 1087
BETWEEN:
LJUBICA TOSIC
Applicant
- and -
THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION
Respondent
REASONS FOR ORDER
LEMIEUX J.:
[1] The applicant, a 69-year-old citizen of the Yugoslav Federation, seeks a stay of removal from Canada.
[2] Her underlying leave application challenges an August 21, 2001 decision made by a Post Claim Determination Officer ("PCDO") that she was not a member of the PDRCC class. The applicant's written challenge and oral submissions by her daughter raise no serious issue that this decision was wrong.
[3] The applicant apparently made an abortive attempt to file an H & C application in May of 2000 which was not processed because the Case Processing Centre in Vagreville, Alberta never received it nor were fees paid.
[4] Last week, the applicant filed a fresh H & C application and, of course, no decision has yet been made. It is well-known that, in and of itself, an outstanding H & C application is not a ground for deferring a removal given the statutory duty in section 48 of the Immigration Act to execute removals as soon as practicable.
[5] The applicant has not shown any grounds why her removal should not take place despite her difficult individual circumstances and those of her daughter and granddaughter who are Canadian citizens.
[6] Her H & C application will be processed in her absence and, in the circumstances, the authorities may process that application expeditiously.
[7] This stay application is dismissed.
J U D G E

Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca

Related cases