Connie Brauer and Victor Harris v. Her Majesty the Queen
Source text
Connie Brauer and Victor Harris v. Her Majesty the Queen Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2007-11-22 Neutral citation 2007 FC 1226 File numbers T-1361-06 Decision Content Date: 20071122 Docket: T-1361-06 Citation: 2007 FC 1226 BETWEEN: CONNIE BRAUER and VICTOR HARRIS Plaintiffs and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Defendant ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS JUDITH CHARLES, ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] This is an assessment of the Defendant’s bill of costs following the Court’s granting of the Defendant’s notice of motion for an order striking out the Statement of Claim in its entirety with costs to the Defendant. [2] The Defendant filed the bill of costs and an affidavit on April 3, 2007 and requested the assessment be conducted in writing. [3] The Plaintiff filed written representations in response to the bill of costs on April 4, 2007. On the basis of the documents on file, the assessment proceeded. [4] The Defendant’s fees are allowed at $720 for the following items per Tariff B : Item 5 (Preparation, service and filing of Motion) 3 units; Item 6 (Appearance on a motion) 1 unit; Item 26 (Assessment of Costs) 2 units. [5] The Defendant submitted $854.15 in disbursements for photocopying costs. Given the volume of material which had to be reproduced and the amount sought is supported by invoices, the requested amount is allowed. [6] The bill of costs totalling $1,574.15 is allowed. A certificate of assessment in this amount will be issued. “Judith Charles” JUDITH CHARLES ASSESSMEN…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Connie Brauer and Victor Harris v. Her Majesty the Queen Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2007-11-22 Neutral citation 2007 FC 1226 File numbers T-1361-06 Decision Content Date: 20071122 Docket: T-1361-06 Citation: 2007 FC 1226 BETWEEN: CONNIE BRAUER and VICTOR HARRIS Plaintiffs and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Defendant ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS JUDITH CHARLES, ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] This is an assessment of the Defendant’s bill of costs following the Court’s granting of the Defendant’s notice of motion for an order striking out the Statement of Claim in its entirety with costs to the Defendant. [2] The Defendant filed the bill of costs and an affidavit on April 3, 2007 and requested the assessment be conducted in writing. [3] The Plaintiff filed written representations in response to the bill of costs on April 4, 2007. On the basis of the documents on file, the assessment proceeded. [4] The Defendant’s fees are allowed at $720 for the following items per Tariff B : Item 5 (Preparation, service and filing of Motion) 3 units; Item 6 (Appearance on a motion) 1 unit; Item 26 (Assessment of Costs) 2 units. [5] The Defendant submitted $854.15 in disbursements for photocopying costs. Given the volume of material which had to be reproduced and the amount sought is supported by invoices, the requested amount is allowed. [6] The bill of costs totalling $1,574.15 is allowed. A certificate of assessment in this amount will be issued. “Judith Charles” JUDITH CHARLES ASSESSMENT OFFICER HALIFAX, NOVA SCOTIA November 22, 2007 FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAME OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: T-1361-06 STYLE OF CAUSE: Connie Brauer and Victor Harris v. Her Majesty the Queen ASSESSMENT IN WRITING WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE OF PARTIES PLACE OF TAXATION: Halifax, Nova Scotia ASSESSMENT OF COSTS – REASONS BY: JUDITH CHARLES, ASSESSMENT OFFICER DATE OF REASONS: November 22, 2007 SOLICITOR OF RECORD: John H. Sims, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada Halifax, Nova Scotia FOR THE RESPONDENT
Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca
Administration des aéroports régionaux d’Edmonton c. Thibodeau
2024 CAF 196