Skip to main content
Federal Court of Appeal· 2002

Byer v. Canada

2002 FCA 429
Quebec civil lawJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Byer v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2002-11-08 Neutral citation 2002 FCA 429 File numbers A-214-02 Decision Content Date: 20021108 Docket: A-214-02 Neutral citation: 2002 FCA 429 CORAM: DÉCARY J.A. NADON J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: STEPHEN M. BYER Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA Respondent Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on November 5, 2002. Judgment rendered at Ottawa, Ontario, on November 8, 2002. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: DÉCARY J.A. CONCURRED IN BY: NADON J.A. MALONE J.A. Date: 20021108 Docket: A-214-02 Neutral citation: 2002 FCA 429 CORAM: DÉCARY J.A. NADON J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: STEPHEN M. BYER Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT DÉCARY J.A. [1] This is an appeal from the Order made by Mr. Justice Blanchard on April 9, 2002 wherein, inter alia, he ordered that the motion by the respondent to strike the appellant's statement of claim be heard by the Court on April 23, 2002. [2] The appellant, who had himself proposed a date for a hearing, submits that the respondent was not entitled to move, by way of a letter request, for an oral hearing concerning Her motion to strike. The appeal has no merit whatsoever and should be dismissed with costs. In the circumstances, the Court is of the view that a lump sum of $2,000.00, inclusive of disbursements, should be paid by the appellant to the respondent in lieu of assessed costs (see Rule 400(4)). "Robert Décary" J.A. "I agree. …

Read full judgment
Byer v. Canada
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2002-11-08
Neutral citation
2002 FCA 429
File numbers
A-214-02
Decision Content
Date: 20021108
Docket: A-214-02
Neutral citation: 2002 FCA 429
CORAM: DÉCARY J.A.
NADON J.A.
MALONE J.A.
BETWEEN:
STEPHEN M. BYER
Appellant
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA
Respondent
Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on November 5, 2002.
Judgment rendered at Ottawa, Ontario, on November 8, 2002.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: DÉCARY J.A.
CONCURRED IN BY: NADON J.A.
MALONE J.A.
Date: 20021108
Docket: A-214-02
Neutral citation: 2002 FCA 429
CORAM: DÉCARY J.A.
NADON J.A.
MALONE J.A.
BETWEEN:
STEPHEN M. BYER
Appellant
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
DÉCARY J.A.
[1] This is an appeal from the Order made by Mr. Justice Blanchard on April 9, 2002 wherein, inter alia, he ordered that the motion by the respondent to strike the appellant's statement of claim be heard by the Court on April 23, 2002.
[2] The appellant, who had himself proposed a date for a hearing, submits that the respondent was not entitled to move, by way of a letter request, for an oral hearing concerning Her motion to strike. The appeal has no merit whatsoever and should be dismissed with costs. In the circumstances, the Court is of the view that a lump sum of $2,000.00, inclusive of disbursements, should be paid by the appellant to the respondent in lieu of assessed costs (see Rule 400(4)).
"Robert Décary"
J.A.
"I agree.
M. Nadon, J.A."
"I agree.
B. Malone, J.A."
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-214-02
STYLE OF CAUSE: Stephen M. Byer v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada
PLACE OF HEARING: Ottawa, Ontario
DATE OF HEARING: November 5, 2002
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: Décary J.A.
CONCURRED IN BY: Nadon J.A.
Malone J.A.
DATED: November 8, 2002
APPEARANCES:
Mr. Stephen M. Byer ON HIS OWN BEHALF
Mr. Daniel Latulippe FOR THE RESPONDENT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Mr. Stephen M. Byer
Verdun, Quebec ON HIS OWN BEHALF
Mr. Morris Rosenberg
Deputy Attorney General of Canada FOR THE RESPONDENT

Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca

Related cases