Arthur D. Little Inc. v. Coopers & Lybrand (Application)
Court headnote
Arthur D. Little Inc. v. Coopers & Lybrand (Application) Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1989-10-13 Report [1989] 2 SCR 981 Case number 20521 Judges Wilson, Bertha On appeal from Manitoba Subjects Action Notes SCC Case Information: 20521 Decision Content Arthur D. Little Inc. v. Coopers & Lybrand (Application), [1989] 2 S.C.R. 981 Arthur D. Little Inc. and Arthur D. Little of Canada Ltd. Appellants v. Coopers & Lybrand (formerly known as MacDonald, Currie & Co.) Respondent and Newman, MacLean & Associates Respondent indexed as: arthur d. little inc. v. coopers & lybrand (application) File No.: 20521. 1989: October 13. Present: Wilson J. application to vary a judgment Practice -- Application to vary a judgment -- Settlement as between Arthur D. Little and Newman, MacLean & Associates at the outset of the hearing of the appeal -- Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada, SOR/83‑74, ss. 5, 50(1), (2). APPLICATION to vary a judgment, [1989] 1 S.C.R. 293. Application allowed. //Wilson J.// WILSON J. -- The judgment of the Court is varied to read as follows: On consent, the appeal as against Newman, MacLean & Associates is dismissed without costs. The appeal as against Coopers & Lybrand (formerly known as MacDonald, Currie & Co.) is allowed, the order of the Court of Appeal set aside, and the order of Scollin J. reinstated. Costs to the appellants both here and in the Court of Appeal in the cause. Judgment accordingly. Solicitors for the appellants: Monk, Goodwin, Winnipeg. Sol…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.scc-csc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Arthur D. Little Inc. v. Coopers & Lybrand (Application) Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1989-10-13 Report [1989] 2 SCR 981 Case number 20521 Judges Wilson, Bertha On appeal from Manitoba Subjects Action Notes SCC Case Information: 20521 Decision Content Arthur D. Little Inc. v. Coopers & Lybrand (Application), [1989] 2 S.C.R. 981 Arthur D. Little Inc. and Arthur D. Little of Canada Ltd. Appellants v. Coopers & Lybrand (formerly known as MacDonald, Currie & Co.) Respondent and Newman, MacLean & Associates Respondent indexed as: arthur d. little inc. v. coopers & lybrand (application) File No.: 20521. 1989: October 13. Present: Wilson J. application to vary a judgment Practice -- Application to vary a judgment -- Settlement as between Arthur D. Little and Newman, MacLean & Associates at the outset of the hearing of the appeal -- Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada, SOR/83‑74, ss. 5, 50(1), (2). APPLICATION to vary a judgment, [1989] 1 S.C.R. 293. Application allowed. //Wilson J.// WILSON J. -- The judgment of the Court is varied to read as follows: On consent, the appeal as against Newman, MacLean & Associates is dismissed without costs. The appeal as against Coopers & Lybrand (formerly known as MacDonald, Currie & Co.) is allowed, the order of the Court of Appeal set aside, and the order of Scollin J. reinstated. Costs to the appellants both here and in the Court of Appeal in the cause. Judgment accordingly. Solicitors for the appellants: Monk, Goodwin, Winnipeg. Solicitors for the respondent Coopers & Lybrand: Aikins, MacAulay & Thorvaldson, Winnipeg. Solicitors for the respondent Newman, MacLean & Associates: Tallin & Kristjansson, Winnipeg.
Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca
Administration des aéroports régionaux d’Edmonton c. Thibodeau
2024 CAF 196