Canada v. Lacroix
Source text
Canada v. Lacroix Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2010-11-30 Neutral citation 2010 FCA 323 File numbers A-39-10 Decision Content Federal Court of Appeal Cour d’appel fédérale Date: 20101130 Docket: A-39-10 Citation: 2010 FCA 323 [ENGLISH TRANSLATION] Present: NOËL J.A. BETWEEN: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Appellant and JEAN-ROBERT LACROIX, representing CANADEVIM LTÉE, under subsection 38(1) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act Respondent Motion dealt with in writing without appearance of parties. Order delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, November 30, 2010. REASONS FOR ORDER BY: NOËL J.A. Federal Court of Appeal Cour d’appel fédérale Date: 20101130 Docket: A-39-10 Citation: 2010 FCA 323 Present: NOËL J.A. BETWEEN: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Appellant and JEAN-ROBERT LACROIX, Representing CANADEVIM LTÉE, under subsection 38(1) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER NOËL J.A. [1] The Court would like to note that, in contrast to what counsel for the respondent seems to believe, the motion for an extension of time and the supporting affidavit comply with Rule 82 of the Rules of Practice. The motion was submitted by Mr. Danis, and the affidavit is that of Mr. Denis. [2] The application for dismissal for failure to submit a requisition for hearing in a timely manner is therefore dismissed, and the application for an extension of time will be allowed. The application to have the hearing of the appeal scheduled must be submitted within ten (10) day…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Canada v. Lacroix Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2010-11-30 Neutral citation 2010 FCA 323 File numbers A-39-10 Decision Content Federal Court of Appeal Cour d’appel fédérale Date: 20101130 Docket: A-39-10 Citation: 2010 FCA 323 [ENGLISH TRANSLATION] Present: NOËL J.A. BETWEEN: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Appellant and JEAN-ROBERT LACROIX, representing CANADEVIM LTÉE, under subsection 38(1) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act Respondent Motion dealt with in writing without appearance of parties. Order delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, November 30, 2010. REASONS FOR ORDER BY: NOËL J.A. Federal Court of Appeal Cour d’appel fédérale Date: 20101130 Docket: A-39-10 Citation: 2010 FCA 323 Present: NOËL J.A. BETWEEN: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Appellant and JEAN-ROBERT LACROIX, Representing CANADEVIM LTÉE, under subsection 38(1) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER NOËL J.A. [1] The Court would like to note that, in contrast to what counsel for the respondent seems to believe, the motion for an extension of time and the supporting affidavit comply with Rule 82 of the Rules of Practice. The motion was submitted by Mr. Danis, and the affidavit is that of Mr. Denis. [2] The application for dismissal for failure to submit a requisition for hearing in a timely manner is therefore dismissed, and the application for an extension of time will be allowed. The application to have the hearing of the appeal scheduled must be submitted within ten (10) days of this order. “Marc Noël” J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-39-10 STYLE OF CAUSE: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN v. JEAN-ROBERT LACROIX, representing CANADEVIM LTÉE, under subsection 38(1) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act MOTION DEALT WITH IN WRITING WITHOUT APPEARANCE OF PARTIES REASONS FOR ORDER BY: NOËL J.A. DATED: November 30, 2010 WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS BY: Benoît Denis Gérald Danis FOR THE APPELLANT Chantal Donaldson FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Larivière Meunier Litigation Section, Ministère du Revenu du Québec Montréal, Quebec FOR THE APPELLANT LeBlanc, Donaldson Gatineau, Quebec FOR THE RESPONDENT
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca
Quebec (Attorney General) v A
[2013] 1 SCR 61