Paris v. Canada (Attorney General)
Court headnote
Paris v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2002-10-23 Neutral citation 2002 FCA 410 File numbers A-725-98 Decision Content Date: 20021023 Docket: A-725-98 Neutral citation: 2002 FCA 410 Between: WALTER PARIS Appellant and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS FRANÇOIS MARTIN, ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] This assessment of costs is further to the judgment on June 5, 2001, dismissing the appeal, with costs to the respondent. [2] Counsel for the respondent filed his bill of costs on August 23, 2002, accompanied by a request for a decision without a personal appearance by the parties. [3] On September 6, 2002, a copy of the respondent's bill of costs was sent to the appellant for his written comments, which have not been provided to date. In view of the foregoing, I am ready to assess the costs to the respondent. [4] The fees requested are awarded, except for the request under item 26 for assessment of costs. As the assessment of costs was not challenged, 2 units are awarded. [5] The disbursements are awarded as requested. [6] The respondent's costs are accordingly assessed and allowed in the amount of $1,999.40. A certificate is issued for that amount. "François Martin" Assessment Officer MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC October 23, 2002 Certified true translation Suzanne M. Gauthier, C. Tr., LL.L. FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA APPEAL DIVISION Date: 20021023 Docket: A-725-98 BETWEEN: WALTER PARIS Appellant and THE ATTORNEY…
Read full judgment
Paris v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2002-10-23 Neutral citation 2002 FCA 410 File numbers A-725-98 Decision Content Date: 20021023 Docket: A-725-98 Neutral citation: 2002 FCA 410 Between: WALTER PARIS Appellant and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS FRANÇOIS MARTIN, ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] This assessment of costs is further to the judgment on June 5, 2001, dismissing the appeal, with costs to the respondent. [2] Counsel for the respondent filed his bill of costs on August 23, 2002, accompanied by a request for a decision without a personal appearance by the parties. [3] On September 6, 2002, a copy of the respondent's bill of costs was sent to the appellant for his written comments, which have not been provided to date. In view of the foregoing, I am ready to assess the costs to the respondent. [4] The fees requested are awarded, except for the request under item 26 for assessment of costs. As the assessment of costs was not challenged, 2 units are awarded. [5] The disbursements are awarded as requested. [6] The respondent's costs are accordingly assessed and allowed in the amount of $1,999.40. A certificate is issued for that amount. "François Martin" Assessment Officer MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC October 23, 2002 Certified true translation Suzanne M. Gauthier, C. Tr., LL.L. FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA APPEAL DIVISION Date: 20021023 Docket: A-725-98 BETWEEN: WALTER PARIS Appellant and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA APPEAL DIVISION SOLICITORS OF RECORD COURT FILE No.: A-725-98 Between: WALTER PARIS AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA ASSESSMENT OF COSTS WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Montréal, Quebec REASONS BY: FRANÇOIS MARTIN, ASSESSMENT OFFICER DATE OF REASONS: October 23, 2002 SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Pascal Lescarbeau for the appellant Montréal, Quebec Morris Rosenberg for the respondent Deputy Attorney General of Canada Ottawa, Ontario
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca