Keiser v. Kalmet
Court headnote
Keiser v. Kalmet Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1911-05-08 Report (1911) 47 SCR 402 Judges Fitzpatrick, Charles; Davies, Louis Henry; Idington, John; Duff, Lyman Poore; Anglin, Francis Alexander On appeal from Alberta Subjects Appeal Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Keiser v. Kalmet, (1911) 47 S.C.R. 402 Date: 1911-05-08 Keiser; v. Kalmet 1911: May 2, 3, 8. Present:—Sir Charles Fitzpatrick C.J. and Davies, Idington, Duff and Anglin JJ. ON APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ALBERTA. Appeal—Practice—Findings by trial judge. APPEAL from the judgment of the Supreme Court of Alberta[1], affirming the judgment of Harvey J., at the trial, maintaining the plaintiff's action with costs, Beck J. dissenting. The Supreme Court of Canada, after hearing counsel on behalf of both parties, reserved judgment, and, on a subsequent day, it was ordered that a new trial should be had, all costs up to date to abide the result. New trial ordered. Walsh K.C. for the appellant. T. Lewis K.C. for the respondent. [1] 3 Alta. L.R. 26. …
Read full judgment
Keiser v. Kalmet Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1911-05-08 Report (1911) 47 SCR 402 Judges Fitzpatrick, Charles; Davies, Louis Henry; Idington, John; Duff, Lyman Poore; Anglin, Francis Alexander On appeal from Alberta Subjects Appeal Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Keiser v. Kalmet, (1911) 47 S.C.R. 402 Date: 1911-05-08 Keiser; v. Kalmet 1911: May 2, 3, 8. Present:—Sir Charles Fitzpatrick C.J. and Davies, Idington, Duff and Anglin JJ. ON APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ALBERTA. Appeal—Practice—Findings by trial judge. APPEAL from the judgment of the Supreme Court of Alberta[1], affirming the judgment of Harvey J., at the trial, maintaining the plaintiff's action with costs, Beck J. dissenting. The Supreme Court of Canada, after hearing counsel on behalf of both parties, reserved judgment, and, on a subsequent day, it was ordered that a new trial should be had, all costs up to date to abide the result. New trial ordered. Walsh K.C. for the appellant. T. Lewis K.C. for the respondent. [1] 3 Alta. L.R. 26.
Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca