Pearson v. Canada
Source text
Pearson v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2009-12-07 Neutral citation 2009 FCA 359 File numbers A-8-09 Decision Content Date: 20091207 Docket: A-8-09 Citation: 2009 FCA 359 CORAM: SEXTON J.A. EVANS J.A. SHARLOW J.A. BETWEEN: REVEREND EDWIN PEARSON, REVEREND MICHEL ETHIER, and JAMES ROSCOE HOAD Appellants and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN As represented by THE MINISTER OF JUSTICE OF CANADA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA, and THE SOLICITOR GENERAL OF CANADA Respondents Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on December 7, 2009. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on December 7, 2009. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: SHARLOW J.A. Date: 20091207 Docket: A-8-09 Citation: 2009 FCA 359 CORAM: SEXTON J.A. EVANS J.A. SHARLOW J.A. BETWEEN: REVEREND EDWIN PEARSON, REVEREND MICHEL ETHIER, and JAMES ROSCOE HOAD Appellants and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN As represented by THE MINISTER OF JUSTICE OF CANADA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA, and THE SOLICITOR GENERAL OF CANADA Respondents REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on December 7, 2009) SHARLOW J.A. [1] This is an appeal of the Judgment of Justice Hughes (2008 FC 1367) dismissing an appeal of the order of Prothonotary Aalto (2008 FC 1161) striking the Appellants’ statement of claim without leave to amend. We have not been persuaded that Justice Hughes’ decision is wrong in law or that Justice Hughes made any error warranting the intervention of this Court. Fo…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Pearson v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2009-12-07 Neutral citation 2009 FCA 359 File numbers A-8-09 Decision Content Date: 20091207 Docket: A-8-09 Citation: 2009 FCA 359 CORAM: SEXTON J.A. EVANS J.A. SHARLOW J.A. BETWEEN: REVEREND EDWIN PEARSON, REVEREND MICHEL ETHIER, and JAMES ROSCOE HOAD Appellants and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN As represented by THE MINISTER OF JUSTICE OF CANADA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA, and THE SOLICITOR GENERAL OF CANADA Respondents Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on December 7, 2009. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on December 7, 2009. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: SHARLOW J.A. Date: 20091207 Docket: A-8-09 Citation: 2009 FCA 359 CORAM: SEXTON J.A. EVANS J.A. SHARLOW J.A. BETWEEN: REVEREND EDWIN PEARSON, REVEREND MICHEL ETHIER, and JAMES ROSCOE HOAD Appellants and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN As represented by THE MINISTER OF JUSTICE OF CANADA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA, and THE SOLICITOR GENERAL OF CANADA Respondents REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on December 7, 2009) SHARLOW J.A. [1] This is an appeal of the Judgment of Justice Hughes (2008 FC 1367) dismissing an appeal of the order of Prothonotary Aalto (2008 FC 1161) striking the Appellants’ statement of claim without leave to amend. We have not been persuaded that Justice Hughes’ decision is wrong in law or that Justice Hughes made any error warranting the intervention of this Court. For that reason, this appeal will be dismissed with costs. “K. Sharlow” J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-8-09 (AN APPEAL FROM THE ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HUGHES, DATED DECEMBER 11, 2008, FROM THE FEDERAL COURT FILE NO.: T-1430-07) STYLE OF CAUSE: REVEREND EDWIN PEARSON ET. AL. v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ET. AL. PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO DATE OF HEARING: DECEMBER 7, 2009 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: (SEXTON, EVANS & SHARLOW JJ.A.) DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: SHARLOW J.A. APPEARANCES: Charles Roach FOR THE APPELLANTS James Gorham Susan Keenan FOR THE RESPONDENTS SOLICITORS OF RECORD: ROACH, SCHWARTZ & ASSOCIATES Toronto, Ontario FOR THE APPELLANTS John H. Sims, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada FOR THE RESPONDENTS
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca