Skip to main content
Supreme Court of Canada· 1924

Hamel v. Patenaude

[1925] SCR 493
Quebec civil lawJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Hamel v. Patenaude Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1924-12-30 Report [1925] SCR 493 Judges Anglin, Francis Alexander; Idington, John; Duff, Lyman Poore; Mignault, Pierre-Basile; Newcombe, Edmund Leslie; Rinfret, Thibaudeau On appeal from Quebec Subjects Sale Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Hamel v. Patenaude, [1925] S.C.R. 493 Date: 1924-12-30 Hamel v. Patenaude 1924: November 26, 27; 1924: December 30. Present: Anglin C.J.C. and Idington, Duff, Mignault, Newcombe and Rinfret JJ. ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF KING'S BENCH, APPEAL SIDE, PROVINCE OF QUEBEC Sale—Immovable—Mandate—Commission—Profit—Arts. 1233, 1722 C.C. APPEAL from the judgment of the Court of King's Bench, appeal side, province of Quebec[1], reversing the judgment of the Superior Court and dismissing the appellant's action. The appellants, real estate agents, brought action against the respondent to recover the sum of $5,000, as commission for the sale of an immovable property belonging to the respondent. The Superior Court maintained the action; the Court of King's Bench reversed this judgment. The Supreme Court of Canada, after argument by the appellant's counsel and the respondent's counsel, reversed this judgment and maintained the appeal with costs. L. E. Beaulieu K.C. for the appellant. Lafleur K.C. and Duranleau K.C. for the respondent. [1] [1923] Q.R. 35 K.B. 333. …

Read full judgment
Hamel v. Patenaude
Collection
Supreme Court Judgments
Date
1924-12-30
Report
[1925] SCR 493
Judges
Anglin, Francis Alexander; Idington, John; Duff, Lyman Poore; Mignault, Pierre-Basile; Newcombe, Edmund Leslie; Rinfret, Thibaudeau
On appeal from
Quebec
Subjects
Sale
Decision Content
Supreme Court of Canada
Hamel v. Patenaude, [1925] S.C.R. 493
Date: 1924-12-30
Hamel v. Patenaude
1924: November 26, 27; 1924: December 30.
Present: Anglin C.J.C. and Idington, Duff, Mignault, Newcombe and Rinfret JJ.
ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF KING'S BENCH, APPEAL SIDE, PROVINCE OF QUEBEC
Sale—Immovable—Mandate—Commission—Profit—Arts. 1233, 1722 C.C.
APPEAL from the judgment of the Court of King's Bench, appeal side, province of Quebec[1], reversing the judgment of the Superior Court and dismissing the appellant's action.
The appellants, real estate agents, brought action against the respondent to recover the sum of $5,000, as commission for the sale of an immovable property belonging to the respondent. The Superior Court maintained the action; the Court of King's Bench reversed this judgment.
The Supreme Court of Canada, after argument by the appellant's counsel and the respondent's counsel, reversed this judgment and maintained the appeal with costs.
L. E. Beaulieu K.C. for the appellant.
Lafleur K.C. and Duranleau K.C. for the respondent.
[1] [1923] Q.R. 35 K.B. 333.

Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca

Related cases