Canada (Fisheries and Oceans) v. Environmental Defence Canada

Canada (Fisheries and Oceans) v. Environmental Defence Canada
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2009-04-29
Neutral citation
2009 FCA 136
File numbers
A-87-09
Decision Content
Date: 20090429
Docket: A-87-09
Citation: 2009 FCA 136
CORAM: NADON J.A.
RYER J.A.
TRUDEL J.A.
BETWEEN:
MINISTER OF FISHERIES AND OCEANS
Appellant
and
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE CANADA,
GEORGIA STRAIT ALLIANCE,
WESTERN CANADA WILDERNESS COMMITTEE
and DAVID SUZUKI FOUNDATION
Respondents
Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on April 29, 2009.
Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on April 29, 2009.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NADON J.A.
Date: 20090429
Docket: A-87-09
Citation: 2009 FCA 136
CORAM: NADON J.A.
RYER J.A.
TRUDEL J.A.
BETWEEN:
MINISTER OF FISHERIES AND OCEANS
Appellant
and
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE CANADA,
GEORGIA STRAIT ALLIANCE,
WESTERN CANADA WILDERNESS COMMITTEE
and DAVID SUZUKI FOUNDATION
Respondents
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on April 29, 2009)
NADON J.A.
[1] Before us is an appeal of a decision of Madam Justice Layden-Stevenson, then a judge of the Federal Court, 2009 FC 131, dated February 10, 2009, which upheld a decision of Prothonotary Lafrenière, dated November 4, 2008, to the effect that the redacted portion of a memo dated July 18, 2007 to the Deputy Minister of Fisheries was not protected by solicitor-client privilege.
[2] We all agree that in light of the affidavit of Mr. Ahluwalia, filed in support of the Minister’s assertion of privilege, it was entirely open to the Motions Judge, as it was to the Prothonotary, to conclude that the Minister had failed to meet the burden of establishing the existence of solicitor-client privilege.
[3] In view of this conclusion, we need not express a view with regard to the issue of waiver raised by the respondents, nor need we address the other grounds raised by the Minister in this appeal.
[4] Consequently, the appeal will be dismissed.
“M. Nadon”
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-87-09
STYLE OF CAUSE: MIN. OF FISHERIES AND OCEANS v. ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE CANADA ET AL.
PLACE OF HEARING: Ottawa and Vancouver (via videoconference)
DATE OF HEARING: April 29, 2009
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: Nadon, Ryer, Trudel JJ.A.
DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: NadonJ.A.
APPEARANCES:
Marja K. Bulmer
Paul Partridge
FOR THE APPELLANT
Lara Tessaro
Judah Harrison
FOR THE RESPONDENT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
John H. Sims, Q.C.
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
FOR THE APPELLANT
Lara Tessaro
Vancouver, B.C.
FOR THE RESPONDENT