Grenon v. Canada
Source text
Grenon v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2007-06-14 Neutral citation 2007 FCA 239 File numbers A-288-06 Decision Content Date: 20070614 Docket: A-288-06 Citation: 2007 FCA 239 CORAM: DÉCARY J.A. SEXTON J.A. PELLETIER J.A. BETWEEN: JAMES T. GRENON Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent Heard at Calgary, Alberta, on June 14, 2007. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Calgary, Alberta, on June 14, 2007. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: DÉCARY JA Date: 20070614 Docket: A-288-06 Citation: 2007 FCA 239 CORAM: DÉCARY J.A. SEXTON J.A. PELLETIER J.A. BETWEEN: JAMES T. GRENON Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Calgary, Alberta, on June 14, 2007) DÉCARY JA [1] With respect to the appeal, we are of the view that the Tax Court Judge exercised his discretion judicially in refusing to stay the proceedings and in refusing to grant the amendments sought by the appellant to his third amended Notice of Appeal. The language used by the Judge in his exchanges with counsel was certainly colourful, but in the end and in context they do not support a finding of reasonable apprehension of bias. [2] With respect to the cross-appeal by the Crown, it is obvious that the Judge has mistakenly allowed the amendments to paragraphs 25.2 and 25.3 to go in. [3] We will dismiss the appeal with costs and allow the cross-appeal with costs. Paragraphs 25.2 and 25.3 will be struck out. “Robert D…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Grenon v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2007-06-14 Neutral citation 2007 FCA 239 File numbers A-288-06 Decision Content Date: 20070614 Docket: A-288-06 Citation: 2007 FCA 239 CORAM: DÉCARY J.A. SEXTON J.A. PELLETIER J.A. BETWEEN: JAMES T. GRENON Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent Heard at Calgary, Alberta, on June 14, 2007. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Calgary, Alberta, on June 14, 2007. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: DÉCARY JA Date: 20070614 Docket: A-288-06 Citation: 2007 FCA 239 CORAM: DÉCARY J.A. SEXTON J.A. PELLETIER J.A. BETWEEN: JAMES T. GRENON Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Calgary, Alberta, on June 14, 2007) DÉCARY JA [1] With respect to the appeal, we are of the view that the Tax Court Judge exercised his discretion judicially in refusing to stay the proceedings and in refusing to grant the amendments sought by the appellant to his third amended Notice of Appeal. The language used by the Judge in his exchanges with counsel was certainly colourful, but in the end and in context they do not support a finding of reasonable apprehension of bias. [2] With respect to the cross-appeal by the Crown, it is obvious that the Judge has mistakenly allowed the amendments to paragraphs 25.2 and 25.3 to go in. [3] We will dismiss the appeal with costs and allow the cross-appeal with costs. Paragraphs 25.2 and 25.3 will be struck out. “Robert Décary” J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-288-06 STYLE OF CAUSE: James T. Grenon v. Her Majesty the Queen PLACE OF HEARING: Calgary, Alberta DATE OF HEARING: June 14, 2007 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: DÉCARY J.A. SEXTON J.A. PELLETIER J.A. DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: DÉCARY J.A. APPEARANCES: Mr. Ronald J. Robinson FOR THE APPELLANT Ms. Belinda Schmid FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Mr. Ronald J. Robinson Calgary, Alberta FOR THE APPELLANT Mr. John H. Sims, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada FOR THE RESPONDENT
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca