Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Boutique Jacob Inc.
Source text
Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Boutique Jacob Inc. Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2006-11-03 Neutral citation 2006 FCA 359 File numbers A-116-06 Decision Content Date: 20061103 Docket: A-116-06 Citation: 2006 FCA 359 Present: NADON J.A. BETWEEN: CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY Appellant and BOUTIQUE JACOB INC. Respondent Dealt with in writing without appearance of parties. Order delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on November 3, 2006. REASONS FOR ORDER BY: NADON J.A. Date: 20061103 Docket: A-116-06 Citation: 2006 FCA 359 Present: NADON J.A. BETWEEN: CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY Appellant and BOUTIQUE JACOB INC. Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER NADON J.A. [1] After careful review of the parties’ respective submissions, I have come to the conclusion that it will be preferable to determine the weight, if any, to be given to the impugned affidavits when deciding the motions to intervene on their merit. [2] Accordingly, the respondent’s motions shall be dismissed with costs to follow the result of the motions for leave to intervene. J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-116-06 STYLE OF CAUSE: CPR v. BOUTIQUE JACOB INC. MOTION DEALT WITH IN WRITING WITHOUT APPEARANCE OF PARTIES REASONS FOR ORDER BY: NADON J.A. DATED: November 3, 2006 WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS BY: Sandra Sahyouni For the Respondent Jean-Marie Fontaine L. Michel Huart For the Proposed Interveners Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd., A.P. Moller-Mae…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Boutique Jacob Inc. Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2006-11-03 Neutral citation 2006 FCA 359 File numbers A-116-06 Decision Content Date: 20061103 Docket: A-116-06 Citation: 2006 FCA 359 Present: NADON J.A. BETWEEN: CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY Appellant and BOUTIQUE JACOB INC. Respondent Dealt with in writing without appearance of parties. Order delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on November 3, 2006. REASONS FOR ORDER BY: NADON J.A. Date: 20061103 Docket: A-116-06 Citation: 2006 FCA 359 Present: NADON J.A. BETWEEN: CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY Appellant and BOUTIQUE JACOB INC. Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER NADON J.A. [1] After careful review of the parties’ respective submissions, I have come to the conclusion that it will be preferable to determine the weight, if any, to be given to the impugned affidavits when deciding the motions to intervene on their merit. [2] Accordingly, the respondent’s motions shall be dismissed with costs to follow the result of the motions for leave to intervene. J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-116-06 STYLE OF CAUSE: CPR v. BOUTIQUE JACOB INC. MOTION DEALT WITH IN WRITING WITHOUT APPEARANCE OF PARTIES REASONS FOR ORDER BY: NADON J.A. DATED: November 3, 2006 WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS BY: Sandra Sahyouni For the Respondent Jean-Marie Fontaine L. Michel Huart For the Proposed Interveners Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd., A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S, Hapag-Lloyd Container Line GmbH, Safmarine Container Lines N.V., American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection and Indemnity Association Inc. et al. For the Proposed Intervener Canadian National Railway Company. SOLICITORS OF RECORD: The Law Offices of J. Kendrick Sproule For the Respondent Borden Ladner Gervais LLP Montreal, QC Langlois Gaudreau O’Connor LLP Montreal, QC For the Proposed Interveners Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd., A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S, Hapag-Lloyd Container Line GmbH, Safmarine Container Lines N.V., American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection and Indemnity Association Inc. et al. For the Proposed Intervener Canadian National Railway Company.
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca