Skip to main content
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal· 2017

Ursel v. Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat and Association of Justice Counsel

2017 CHRT 3
GeneralJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Ursel v. Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat and Association of Justice Counsel Collection Canadian Human Rights Tribunal Date 2017-01-24 Neutral citation 2017 CHRT 3 File number(s) T2141/1516, T2142/1616 Decision-maker(s) Gallivan, Lisa Decision type Consent Order Grounds Disability Decision Content Canadian Human Rights Tribunal Tribunal canadien des droits de la personne Citation: 2017 CHRT 3 Date: January 24, 2017 File Nos.: T2141/1516 and T2142/1616 Between: Barbara Ursel Complainant - and - Canadian Human Rights Commission Commission - and - Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat Respondent (Employer) - and - Association of Justice Counsel Respondent (Bargaining Agent) Consent Order Member: Lisa Gallivan WHEREAS the Complainant alleges that the employer and the bargaining agent discriminated against her in employment on the grounds of disability, in breach of sections 7, 9 and 10 of the Canadian Human Rights Act (“Act”) as applicable, by not counting her one-year leave without pay for medical reasons as “continuous employment” for the purposes of severance pay; AND WHEREAS strictly for the purposes of this litigation and considering the limited scope of this personal complaint as well as the remedies available to the complainant, the employer and the bargaining agent concede that there is a prima facie case for the purposes of sections 7 and 9 of the Act, respectively; AND WHEREAS the respondents are prepared to assume given the specific and limited facts in this case an…

Read full judgment
Ursel v. Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat and Association of Justice Counsel
Collection
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Date
2017-01-24
Neutral citation
2017 CHRT 3
File number(s)
T2141/1516, T2142/1616
Decision-maker(s)
Gallivan, Lisa
Decision type
Consent Order
Grounds
Disability
Decision Content
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Tribunal canadien des droits de la personne
Citation: 2017 CHRT
3
Date:
January 24, 2017
File Nos.:
T2141/1516 and T2142/1616
Between:
Barbara Ursel
Complainant
- and -
Canadian Human Rights Commission
Commission
- and -
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat
Respondent
(Employer)
- and -
Association of Justice Counsel
Respondent
(Bargaining Agent)
Consent Order
Member:
Lisa Gallivan
WHEREAS the Complainant alleges that the employer and the bargaining agent discriminated against her in employment on the grounds of disability, in breach of sections 7, 9 and 10 of the Canadian Human Rights Act (“Act”) as applicable, by not counting her one-year leave without pay for medical reasons as “continuous employment” for the purposes of severance pay;
AND WHEREAS strictly for the purposes of this litigation and considering the limited scope of this personal complaint as well as the remedies available to the complainant, the employer and the bargaining agent concede that there is a prima facie case for the purposes of sections 7 and 9 of the Act, respectively;
AND WHEREAS the respondents are prepared to assume given the specific and limited facts in this case and keeping in mind the nature of the remedy available that there is a prima facie case for the purposes of section 10 of the Act;
AND WHEREAS the respondents have agreed in principle to amend the impugned language in article 21.06 of the new collective agreement by adding “for reasons other than illness” that has yet to be ratified;
AND WHEREAS the parties have reached a confidential settlement of these Complaints;
Therefore, on consent of the parties, the Tribunal declares:
That article 21.06 of the AJC-TB collective agreement which expired on May 9 2014 is discriminatory in the facts of this case.
Signed by
Lisa Gallivan
Tribunal Member
Ottawa, Ontario
January 24, 2017

Source: decisions.chrt-tcdp.gc.ca

Related cases