Duterville v. Canada
Source text
Duterville v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2011-03-30 Neutral citation 2011 FCA 122 File numbers A-243-10 Decision Content Date: 20110330 Docket: A‑243‑10 Citation: 2011 FCA 122 CORAM: NOËL J.A. NADON J.A. PELLETIER J.A. BETWEEN: ALBERT DUTERVILLE Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN et al. Respondents Dealt with in writing without appearance of parties. Order delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on March 30, 2011. REASONS FOR ORDER BY: NADON J.A. CONCURRED IN BY: NOËL J.A. PELLETIER J.A. Date: 20110330 Docket: A‑243‑10 Citation: 2011 FCA 122 CORAM: NOËL J.A. NADON J.A. PELLETIER J.A. BETWEEN: ALBERT DUTERVILLE Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN et al. Respondents REASONS FOR ORDER NADON J.A. [1] In response to the Notice of Status Review (Notice) issued by Justice Létourneau on January 20, 2011, the appellant filed his written representations on February 8, 2011. The Notice required that his representations include a justification for the delay in proceedings and a proposed timetable for the completion of the steps necessary to advance the proceeding in an expeditious manner. [2] It is clear from reading the representations filed by the appellant that those representations do not meet either of these requirements. The appellant did not produce a proposed timetable or attempt to explain or justify the delay in his appeal process. [3] For these reasons, the appeal will be dismissed for delay. “M. Nadon” J.A. “I agree. M. Noël J.A.” “I agree. J.D. D…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Duterville v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2011-03-30 Neutral citation 2011 FCA 122 File numbers A-243-10 Decision Content Date: 20110330 Docket: A‑243‑10 Citation: 2011 FCA 122 CORAM: NOËL J.A. NADON J.A. PELLETIER J.A. BETWEEN: ALBERT DUTERVILLE Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN et al. Respondents Dealt with in writing without appearance of parties. Order delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on March 30, 2011. REASONS FOR ORDER BY: NADON J.A. CONCURRED IN BY: NOËL J.A. PELLETIER J.A. Date: 20110330 Docket: A‑243‑10 Citation: 2011 FCA 122 CORAM: NOËL J.A. NADON J.A. PELLETIER J.A. BETWEEN: ALBERT DUTERVILLE Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN et al. Respondents REASONS FOR ORDER NADON J.A. [1] In response to the Notice of Status Review (Notice) issued by Justice Létourneau on January 20, 2011, the appellant filed his written representations on February 8, 2011. The Notice required that his representations include a justification for the delay in proceedings and a proposed timetable for the completion of the steps necessary to advance the proceeding in an expeditious manner. [2] It is clear from reading the representations filed by the appellant that those representations do not meet either of these requirements. The appellant did not produce a proposed timetable or attempt to explain or justify the delay in his appeal process. [3] For these reasons, the appeal will be dismissed for delay. “M. Nadon” J.A. “I agree. M. Noël J.A.” “I agree. J.D. Denis Pelletier J.A.” Certified true translation Sarah Burns FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A‑243‑10 STYLE OF CAUSE: Albert Duterville v. Her Majesty the Queen et al. REASONS FOR ORDER BY: NADON J.A. CONCURRED IN BY: NOËL J.A. PELLETIER J.A. REASONS DATED: March 30, 2011 WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS BY: Albert Duterville APPELLANT SELF‑REPRESENTED Nicholas R. Banks FOR THE RESPONDENTS SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Myles J. Kirvan Deputy Attorney General of Canada FOR THE RESPONDENTS
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca