Martel v. Canada
Court headnote
Martel v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2002-03-13 Neutral citation 2002 FCT 279 File numbers T-1906-98 Decision Content Date: 20020313 Docket: T-1906-98 Neutral Citation: 2002 FCT 279 Montréal, Quebec, March 13, 2002 Present: Mr. Richard Morneau, Prothonotary BETWEEN: NANCY MARTEL Applicant (respondent) and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent (applicant) Motion to dismiss for undue delays and production of an inaccurate affidavit. [Rules 167 and 227 of the Federal Court Rules, 1998] REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER [1] The striking out sought by the respondent is dismissed, since it seems to me excessively harsh given the situation that must be remedied here, i.e. the production by the applicant of a more complete affidavit of documents. [2] In this regard, the applicant shall serve under sealed cover by July 26, 2002 a more complete affidavit of documents listing the following documents. A copy of these documents shall also be sent at the same time to counsel for the respondent. 1. The applicant's "notes" to which exhibit 32 in the affidavit of Me Letarte refers. 2. The applicant's medical records. 3. Any relevant document obtained by the applicant under her new identity or any other identity. [3] The applicant shall pay the respondent within thirty (30) days of this order costs in the amount of $450. Richard Morneau Prothonotary Certified true translation Suzanne M. Gauthier, LL.L., Trad. a. FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA TRIAL DIVISION Date: 20020313 Docket: T-1…
Read full judgment
Martel v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2002-03-13 Neutral citation 2002 FCT 279 File numbers T-1906-98 Decision Content Date: 20020313 Docket: T-1906-98 Neutral Citation: 2002 FCT 279 Montréal, Quebec, March 13, 2002 Present: Mr. Richard Morneau, Prothonotary BETWEEN: NANCY MARTEL Applicant (respondent) and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent (applicant) Motion to dismiss for undue delays and production of an inaccurate affidavit. [Rules 167 and 227 of the Federal Court Rules, 1998] REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER [1] The striking out sought by the respondent is dismissed, since it seems to me excessively harsh given the situation that must be remedied here, i.e. the production by the applicant of a more complete affidavit of documents. [2] In this regard, the applicant shall serve under sealed cover by July 26, 2002 a more complete affidavit of documents listing the following documents. A copy of these documents shall also be sent at the same time to counsel for the respondent. 1. The applicant's "notes" to which exhibit 32 in the affidavit of Me Letarte refers. 2. The applicant's medical records. 3. Any relevant document obtained by the applicant under her new identity or any other identity. [3] The applicant shall pay the respondent within thirty (30) days of this order costs in the amount of $450. Richard Morneau Prothonotary Certified true translation Suzanne M. Gauthier, LL.L., Trad. a. FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA TRIAL DIVISION Date: 20020313 Docket: T-1906-98 Between: NANCY MARTEL Applicant (respondent) and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent (applicant) REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA TRIAL DIVISION NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET NO: T-1906-98 STYLE: NANCY MARTEL Applicant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent PLACE OF HEARING: Montréal, Quebec DATE OF HEARING: March 11, 2002 REASONS FOR ORDER OF Mr. RICHARD MORNEAU, PROTHONOTARY DATED: March 13, 2002 APPEARANCES: Elizabeth Goodwin for the applicant Francis Archambault for the respondent SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Grey, Casgrain for the applicant Montréal, Quebec Morris Rosenberg for the respondent Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca