Skip to main content
Federal Court of Appeal· 2004

4093879 Canada Ltd. v. Wal-Mart Canada Corp.

2004 FCA 401
GeneralJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

4093879 Canada Ltd. v. Wal-Mart Canada Corp. Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2004-11-25 Neutral citation 2004 FCA 401 File numbers A-161-04 Decision Content Date: 20041125 Docket: A-161-04 Citation: 2004 FCA 401 CORAM: DÉCARY J.A. SEXTON J.A. EVANS J.A. BETWEEN: 4093879 CANADA LTD. and 4093887 CANADA LTD., a partnership carrying on business under the name and style of "NYGARD INTERNATIONAL PARTNERSHIP", Appellants and WAL-MART CANADA CORP. and WAL-MART STORES, INC., Respondents Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on November 25, 2004. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on November 25, 2004. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: DÉCARY J.A. Date: 20041125 Docket: A-161-04 Citation: 2004 FCA 401 CORAM: DÉCARY J.A. SEXTON J.A. EVANS J.A. BETWEEN: 4093879 CANADA LTD. and 4093887 CANADA LTD., a partnership carrying on business under the name and style of "NYGARD INTERNATIONAL PARTNERSHIP", Appellants and WAL-MART CANADA CORP. and WAL-MART STORES, INC., Respondents REASONS FOR JUDGMENT (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario on November 25, 2004) DÉCARY J.A. [1] We have not been persuaded that the Case Management Judge wrongly exercised his discretion when he did not allow a question to be put to the respondents and qualified that question as amounting to a fishing expedition. [2] The appeal will be dismissed with costs. "Robert Décary" J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-161-04 STYLE OF CAUSE: …

Read full judgment
4093879 Canada Ltd. v. Wal-Mart Canada Corp.
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2004-11-25
Neutral citation
2004 FCA 401
File numbers
A-161-04
Decision Content
Date: 20041125
Docket: A-161-04
Citation: 2004 FCA 401
CORAM: DÉCARY J.A.
SEXTON J.A.
EVANS J.A.
BETWEEN:
4093879 CANADA LTD.
and 4093887 CANADA LTD., a partnership carrying
on business under the name and style
of "NYGARD INTERNATIONAL PARTNERSHIP",
Appellants
and
WAL-MART CANADA CORP.
and WAL-MART STORES, INC.,
Respondents
Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on November 25, 2004.
Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on November 25, 2004.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: DÉCARY J.A.
Date: 20041125
Docket: A-161-04
Citation: 2004 FCA 401
CORAM: DÉCARY J.A.
SEXTON J.A.
EVANS J.A.
BETWEEN:
4093879 CANADA LTD.
and 4093887 CANADA LTD., a partnership carrying
on business under the name and style
of "NYGARD INTERNATIONAL PARTNERSHIP",
Appellants
and
WAL-MART CANADA CORP.
and WAL-MART STORES, INC.,
Respondents
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
(Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario on November 25, 2004)
DÉCARY J.A.
[1] We have not been persuaded that the Case Management Judge wrongly exercised his discretion when he did not allow a question to be put to the respondents and qualified that question as amounting to a fishing expedition.
[2] The appeal will be dismissed with costs.
"Robert Décary"
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-161-04
STYLE OF CAUSE: 409389 CANADA LTD. and 4093887 CANADA LTD.,
a partnership carrying on business under the name and
style of "NYGARD INTERNATIONAL PARTNERSHIP"
Appellants
and
WAL-MART CANADA CORP. and WAL-MART
STORES, INC.
Respondents
PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO
DATE OF HEARING: NOVEMBER 25, 2004
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
OF THE COURT: (DÉCARY, SEXTON, EVANS JJ.A.)
DELIVERED FROM THE
BENCH BY: DÉCARY J.A.
APPEARANCES:
Michael Thomson For the Appellants
E. William Olson
Shane I. Perlmutter For the Respondents
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Tapper Cuddy
Barristers & Solicitors
Winnipeg, ON For the Appellants
Thompson Dorfman Sweatman
Barristers & Solicitors
Winnipeg, ON For the Respondents

Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca

Related cases