Rhéaume v. Stuart
Court headnote
Rhéaume v. Stuart Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1910-10-04 Report (1910) 47 SCR 394 Judges Fitzpatrick, Charles; Girouard, Désiré; Davies, Louis Henry; Idington, John; Duff, Lyman Poore; Anglin, Francis Alexander On appeal from Quebec Subjects Appeal Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Rhéaume v. Stuart, (1910) 47 S.C.R. 394 Date: 1910-10-04 Rhéaume v. Stuart. 1910: October 4. Present: Sir Charles Fitzpatrick C..J. and Girouard, Davies, Idington, Duff and Anglin JJ. ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF KING'S BENCH, APPEAL SIDE, PROVINCE OF QUEBEC. Appeal—Jurisdiction—Interim injunction.—Interlocutory order. MOTION to quash an appeal instituted from the judgment of the Court of King's Bench, appeal side[1], dismissing an appeal from the judgment of the Superior Court, District of Montreal, granting an application by the plaintiff, respondent, for an interim injunction. On motion by counsel for the respondent, counsel for the appellant admitted that the judgment appealed from was not a final judgment. The appeal was, therefore, quashed with costs, for want of jurisdiction. Appeal quashed with costs. Chauvin for the motion. Beaudin K.C. contra. [1] Q.R. 20 K.B. 411. …
Read full judgment
Rhéaume v. Stuart Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1910-10-04 Report (1910) 47 SCR 394 Judges Fitzpatrick, Charles; Girouard, Désiré; Davies, Louis Henry; Idington, John; Duff, Lyman Poore; Anglin, Francis Alexander On appeal from Quebec Subjects Appeal Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Rhéaume v. Stuart, (1910) 47 S.C.R. 394 Date: 1910-10-04 Rhéaume v. Stuart. 1910: October 4. Present: Sir Charles Fitzpatrick C..J. and Girouard, Davies, Idington, Duff and Anglin JJ. ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF KING'S BENCH, APPEAL SIDE, PROVINCE OF QUEBEC. Appeal—Jurisdiction—Interim injunction.—Interlocutory order. MOTION to quash an appeal instituted from the judgment of the Court of King's Bench, appeal side[1], dismissing an appeal from the judgment of the Superior Court, District of Montreal, granting an application by the plaintiff, respondent, for an interim injunction. On motion by counsel for the respondent, counsel for the appellant admitted that the judgment appealed from was not a final judgment. The appeal was, therefore, quashed with costs, for want of jurisdiction. Appeal quashed with costs. Chauvin for the motion. Beaudin K.C. contra. [1] Q.R. 20 K.B. 411.
Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca