Skip to main content
Supreme Court of Canada· 1897

Fraser et al. v. Davidson and Hay

(1897) 28 SCR 272
GeneralJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Fraser et al. v. Davidson and Hay Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1897-05-01 Report (1897) 28 SCR 272 Judges Henry, William Alexander; Strong, Samuel Henry; Gwynne, John Wellington; Sedgewick, Robert; King, George Edwin; Girouard, Désiré On appeal from Ontario Subjects Bankruptcy and insolvency Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Fraser et al. v. Davidson and Hay, (1897) 28 S.C.R. 272 Date: 1897-05-01 Fraser et al and Davidson and Hay 1897: March 12; 1897: May 1. Present: Sir Henry Strong C.J. and Gwynne, Sedgewick, King and Girouard JJ. Insolvency—Assignment—Preference—Payment in money—Cheque of third party. APPEAL from the decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario[1], reversing the judgment of the Common Pleas Division which had allowed an appeal by the defendants against the judgment at the trial by Meredith J. in favour of the plaintiff in respect of one conveyance, and dismissing the action in other respects. After hearing counsel for both parties the court reserved judgment, and on a subsequent day dismissed the appeal with costs and without giving any written reasons for judgment. Matthew Wilson Q.C. for the appellants. G.G. Mills for the respondent. [1] 23 Ont. App. R. 439. …

Read full judgment
Fraser et al. v. Davidson and Hay
Collection
Supreme Court Judgments
Date
1897-05-01
Report
(1897) 28 SCR 272
Judges
Henry, William Alexander; Strong, Samuel Henry; Gwynne, John Wellington; Sedgewick, Robert; King, George Edwin; Girouard, Désiré
On appeal from
Ontario
Subjects
Bankruptcy and insolvency
Decision Content
Supreme Court of Canada
Fraser et al. v. Davidson and Hay, (1897) 28 S.C.R. 272
Date: 1897-05-01
Fraser et al
and
Davidson and Hay
1897: March 12; 1897: May 1.
Present: Sir Henry Strong C.J. and Gwynne, Sedgewick, King and Girouard JJ.
Insolvency—Assignment—Preference—Payment in money—Cheque of third party.
APPEAL from the decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario[1], reversing the judgment of the Common Pleas Division which had allowed an appeal by the defendants against the judgment at the trial by Meredith J. in favour of the plaintiff in respect of one conveyance, and dismissing the action in other respects.
After hearing counsel for both parties the court reserved judgment, and on a subsequent day dismissed the appeal with costs and without giving any written reasons for judgment.
Matthew Wilson Q.C. for the appellants.
G.G. Mills for the respondent.
[1] 23 Ont. App. R. 439.

Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca

Related cases