“The jury convicted the appellant under deletion of the "£30,000" and the substitution of "a sum of money." He appeals against conviction on the grounds of defective representation by the defending so…”
You're reading the free summary of Ditta v. Her Majesty's Advocate. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.