“The only ground of appeal against conviction which was argued before us was that the sheriff erred in repelling the appellant's submission that there was no case to answer.”
You're reading the free summary of JAMES ANTHONY MACK v. HER MAJESTY'S ADVOCATE. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.