Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 8 • Expulsion • Respect for private life • Expulsion order with a re-entry ban of six years • Existence of very serious reasons for expelling settled migrant who had spent most of his life in the host country and despite being sentenced only to six months� imprisonment • No minimum requirement as to sentence or seriousness of crime resulting in expulsion • Violent aggravated offence and history of serious criminality • Two prior suspended expulsion orders issued against applicant • Proportionality duly assessed by domestic courts in light of Court�s case-law
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
��������� Marko Bo�njak, President, ��������� Jon Fridrik Kj�lbro, ��������� Ale� Pejchal, ��������� Egidijus Kūris, ��������� Branko Lubarda, ��������� Pauliine Koskelo, ��������� Saadet Y�ksel, judges, and Stanley Naismith, Section Registrar,
the application (no. 56803/18 ) against the Kingdom of Denmark lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by an Iraqi national, Mr Marsel Munir Johana (�the applicant�), on 28 November 2018;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.