Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
E. �� Act on the Protection of Minors against Negative Effects of Public Information (Minors Protection Act) 22
(d) � Proposed amendment and parliamentary debate leading to the adoption of the current version of section 4 � 2 (16) of the Minors Protection Act 24
G. �� Rules for marking and distributing public information which may be harmful to the development of minors � 30
I. ��� The 2014 annual report of the Office of the Equal Opportunities Ombudsperson . 33
J. ��� Decisions of the Inspectorate of Journalist Ethics concerning section 4 � 2 (16) of the Minors Protection Act 34
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Put your case reading into practice. The free readiness diagnostic covers SQE1 subjects and highlights where to revise next. No account needed.
Try the free SQE1 diagnosticMultiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
[2023] ECHR 51
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.