Criminal

Moorov v HM Advocate

[1930] ScotHC 1930_JC_68High Court of Justiciary1930

Cite this case in OSCOLA →All Criminal cases →

“In the present case there is direct evidence in support of the factum probandum as regards each charge which the jury found proved.”

Read the full brief — free

You're reading the free summary of Moorov v HM Advocate. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.

Create free account Already have one? Sign in

No card required. Free forever.

Read the full judgment elsewhere

Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.

More Criminal cases

R v Reece Martin Kelly

[2026] EWCA Crim 268

R v Richard Alexander Welsh

[2026] EWCA Crim 466

R v Robert Michael Thomas

[2026] EWCA Crim 305

This case is reproduced verbatim from the public judgment published by The National Archives under the UK Government's Open Government Licence v3.0. If you appear in this case and believe it should not be published — for example because your conviction was quashed on appeal, you have statutory anonymity, or for other privacy reasons — request removal here.