“[1] At a preliminary diet in the Sheriff Court at Dundee, the sheriff was asked to hold that in proceeding with an indictment with a trial diet of 31 July 2000, the Crown were in breach of the appell…”
You're reading the free summary of ALEXANDER TODD MITCHELL v. HER MAJESTY'S ADVOCATE. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.