Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a washing sponge — Earlier designs — Grounds for invalidity — Examination by the Board of Appeal of its own motion of the facts constituting disclosure — Burden of proof on the invalidity applicant — Requirements relating to the reproduction of the prior design)
Aroma Essence Ltd, established in Kazanlak (Bulgaria), represented by A. Nastev, lawyer,
European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), represented by J. Ivanauskas and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents,
ACTION brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 July 2018 (Case R 1197/2017‑3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Aroma Essence and Refan Bulgaria,
composed of M. Prek, President, F. Schalin and M.J. Costeira (Rapporteur), Judges,
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.