Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The applicant, Mr Mairold Veerm�e, is an Estonian national who was born in 1977 and is currently serving a prison sentence in Finland. He was represented before the Court by Ms M. Lehtinen, a lawyer practising in Lahti. The respondent Government were represented by their Agent, Mr A. Kosonen, Director at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties and as they appear from the documents, may be summarised as follows.
On 6 September 2001 the applicant was convicted by a Finnish district court of an aggravated narcotics offence and sentenced to nine years� imprisonment. He had been detained since 19 January 2001. On 28 January 2002 the Directorate of Immigration ( ulkomaalaisvirasto, u tl�nningsverket ) ordered his expulsion to Estonia. The judgment and the expulsion order both became final.
On 5 December 2002 the Criminal Sanctions Agency ( rikosseuraamusvirasto, brottsp�f�ljdsverket ) proposed to the Ministry of Justice that the applicant should serve the rest of his sentence in Estonia. The applicant and the Ministry of the Interior were invited to submit observations. The applicant objected to being transferred to Estonia, whereas the Ministry of the Interior agreed to the transfer.
In its opinion to the Administrative Court, the Ministry of Justice stated the following (as transcribed by the court):
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.