“[1] On 11 December 2006 the appellant pled guilty at Kirkcaldy Sheriff Court to one charge of distributing or showing indecent photographs or pseudo-photographs of children, contrary to section 52(1)…”
You're reading the free summary of Barron v. Her Majesty's Advocate. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.