Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(Common organisation of the markets in the flax and hemp sector - Articles 28 EC and 30 EC - National legislation prohibiting all cultivation and possession of hemp without prior authorisation)
REFERENCE to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Halmstads tingsr�tt (Sweden) for a preliminary ruling in criminal proceedings before it against Ulf Hammarsten
on the interpretation of Articles 28 EC and 30 EC and of the Community legislation applicable to the cultivation and marketing of hemp, THE COURT (Fifth Chamber),
composed of: M. Wathelet, President of the Chamber, D.A.O. Edward, A. La Pergola (Rapporteur), P. Jann and A. Rosas, Judges, Advocate General: C. Stix-Hackl, Registrar: R. Grass,
after considering the written observations submitted on behalf of: - the Swedish Government, by A. Kruse, acting as Agent, - Commission of the European Communities, by L. Str�m, acting as Agent, having regard to the report of the Judge-Rapporteur,
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.