Criminal

PAUL CULLINGTON v. HER MAJESTY'S ADVOCATE

[1999] ScotHC 172High Court of Justiciary1999

Cite this case in OSCOLA →All Criminal cases →

“"There was insufficient corroboration of the complainer's evidence.”

Read the full brief — free

You're reading the free summary of PAUL CULLINGTON v. HER MAJESTY'S ADVOCATE. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.

Create free account Already have one? Sign in

No card required. Free forever.

Read the full judgment elsewhere

Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.

More Criminal cases

R v Reece Martin Kelly

[2026] EWCA Crim 268

R v Richard Alexander Welsh

[2026] EWCA Crim 466

R v Robert Michael Thomas

[2026] EWCA Crim 305

This case is reproduced verbatim from the public judgment published by The National Archives under the UK Government's Open Government Licence v3.0. If you appear in this case and believe it should not be published — for example because your conviction was quashed on appeal, you have statutory anonymity, or for other privacy reasons — request removal here.