Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(Free movement of goods - Measures having equivalent effect - European patent ruled void ab initio for failure to file a translation)
REFERENCE to the Court under Article 177 of the EC Treaty (now Article 234 EC) by the Bundespatentgericht, Germany, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between BASF AG
on the interpretation of Articles 30 and 36 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Articles 28 EC and 30 EC), THE COURT (Fifth Chamber),
composed of: J.-P. Puissochet, President of the Chamber, P. Jann, J.C. Moitinho de Almeida, C. Gulmann (Rapporteur) and D.A.O. Edward, Judges, Advocate General: A. La Pergola, Registrar: H.A. R�hl, Principal Administrator,
'Is it compatible with the principles of the free movement of goods (Articles 30 and 36 of the EC Treaty) for a patent granted by the European Patent Office with effect in a Member State which is drafted in a language other than the official language of that Member State to be deemed void ab initio if the patent holder does not file with the patent office of the Member State in question a translation of the patent specification in the official language of that Member State within three months of the publication in the European Patent Bulletin of the mention of the grant of the patent?'
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.