Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This judgment is subject to editorial revision before its reproduction in final form in the official reports of selected judgments and decisions of the Court.
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
The case originated in an application (no. 41854/98) against Cyprus lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”) under former Article 25 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Cypriot national, Mr Modestos Pitsillos (“the applicant”), on 2 June 1998.
The applicant was represented by Mr Vrahimis, a lawyer practising in Nicosia. The Cypriot Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Markides, Attorney-General of the Republic.
The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the length of proceedings he had instituted in connection with the expropriation of his land.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.