Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark wanda films — Earlier EU word mark WANDA — Relative ground for refusal — Restriction of the application for registration — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), represented by P. Sipos and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents,
the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court, being
Dalian Wanda Group Co. Ltd, established in Dalian (China), represented by M. Hawkins, Solicitor, and by T. Dolde and K. Lüder, lawyers,
ACTION brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 July 2018 (affaire R 829/2017-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Dalian Wanda Group and Wanda Films,
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.