“[2] In the grounds of appeal it is alleged (1) that the sheriff misdirected the jury on the issue of identification and (2) that there was a miscarriage of justice on the basis of the existence of si…”
You're reading the free summary of CELIA JANE FRASER v. HER MAJESTY'S ADVOCATE. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.