Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
��������� St�phanie Mourou-Vikstr�m, President, ��������� Georges Ravarani, ��������� Jolien Schukking, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
The case originated in eight applications against Romania lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) on the various dates set out in the table appended to the judgment delivered on 16 May 2019.
In that judgment the Court held that there had been a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of inadequate conditions of detention. The Court also decided to award the applicants non‑pecuniary damages in the amounts set out in the table appended to the judgment.
On 18 September 2019 the Romanian Government (�the Government�) informed the Court that they had learned that Mr. Costel-Cornel Calinciuc, the applicant in application no. 7791/16 , had died in 2017. They accordingly requested the revision of the judgment within the meaning of Rule 80 of the Rules of Court.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.