Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 6 October 2009 as a Chamber composed of:
Françoise Tulkens, President, Ireneu Cabral Barreto, Vladimiro Zagrebelsky, Dragoljub Popović, Nona Tsotsoria, Işıl Karakaş, Kristina Pardalos, judges,
The applicant, Mr Hasan Başak, is a Turkish national who was born in 1926 and lives in Gaziantep. He is represented before the Court by Mr M. Akdoğan, a lawyer practising in Mersin. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) are represented by their Agent. Relying on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, the applicant complained of the delayed payment of his additional expropriation compensation.
The Court considers that it is no longer required to examine the present application, for the reasons elaborated below.
By letter dated 29 October 2008, the Government’s observations were sent to the applicant’s representative, who was requested to submit any comments, together with any claims for just satisfaction, by 10 December 2008. The applicant’s representative did not submit any observations.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.