Criminal

TENCHO HRISTOV ANDONOV MOHAMMED ASAM SIDDIQUE HER MAJESTY'S ADVOCATE v. HER MAJESTY'S ADVOCATE DEYAN NIKOLOV

[2013] ScotHC 2013HCJAC27High Court of Justiciary2013

Cite this case in OSCOLA →All Criminal cases →

“[1] On 29 February 2012 at the High Court in Edinburgh the appellants Andonov and Siddique and the respondent Nikolov were found guilty of the following charge:”

Read the full brief — free

You're reading the free summary of TENCHO HRISTOV ANDONOV MOHAMMED ASAM SIDDIQUE HER MAJESTY'S ADVOCATE v. HER MAJESTY'S ADVOCATE DEYAN NIKOLOV. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.

Create free account Already have one? Sign in

No card required. Free forever.

Read the full judgment elsewhere

Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.

More Criminal cases

R v Reece Martin Kelly

[2026] EWCA Crim 268

R v Richard Alexander Welsh

[2026] EWCA Crim 466

R v Robert Michael Thomas

[2026] EWCA Crim 305

This case is reproduced verbatim from the public judgment published by The National Archives under the UK Government's Open Government Licence v3.0. If you appear in this case and believe it should not be published — for example because your conviction was quashed on appeal, you have statutory anonymity, or for other privacy reasons — request removal here.