Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 16 December 2008 as a Chamber composed of:
Françoise Tulkens, President, Ireneu Cabral Barreto, Vladimiro Zagrebelsky, Danutė Jočienė, Dragoljub Popović, András Sajó, Işıl Karakaş, judges, and Sally Dollé, Section Registrar ,
The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows.
The ownership of a plot of land in Istanbul which had been registered under the name of the applicants was the subject matter of a dispute before the Çatalca Land Registry Court ( Tapulama Mahkemesi ) between the applicants and the State as well as a number of other individuals. The proceedings, which started in 1963, ended on 7 May 1996 by a judgment delivered in favour of the applicants.
At the meanwhile the General Directorate of the State Property ( Arsa Ofisi Genel Müdürlüğü ) decided on 22 January 1986 to expropriate the disputed land. In compliance with the then existing procedure the expropriation of the land and the payment of 31,606,400 Turkish liras (TRL) 1 in return was ordered by the Çatalca Civil Court on 18 November 1987. The parties did not appeal. The decision became final and the compensation amount was deposited in a bank account pending the proceedings before the Çatalca Land Registry Court.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.