“The appellant was found guilty of a charge of contravening section 4(3)(b) of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 in respect that he was concerned in the supply of ecstasy to another or others on 29 March 1…”
You're reading the free summary of JOHN HARRISON v. HER MAJESTY'S ADVOCATE. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.