Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 5 � 1 • Lawful arrest and first pre-trial detention of applicant, a former high-ranking State official , in connection to criminal proceedings against him • Lack of fixed period of detention in detention orders for first pre-trial detention compatible with Art 5 � 1 in view of maximum duration prescribed under domestic law
Art 5 � 3 • Reasonableness of pre-trial detention • Refusal of applicant�s request for release during first pre-trial detention period not based on relevant and sufficient reasons • Domestic court�s failure to take into account new information and conduct fresh examination of grounds for detention as required by the passage of time
Art 5 � 1 • Lawful arrest or detention • Authorities� failure to protect applicant from arbitrariness when imposing second consecutive period of pre-trial detention concerning different parallel criminal proceedings
Art 18 (+ Art 5) • Restriction for unauthorised purposes • Existence of ulterior purpose not established
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.